TOne Academy

Inter-State Relations

Home / Polity / Inter-State Relations

Inter-State Relations

     The effective functioning of India’s federal system relies not only on harmonious relations between the Centre and the states but also on cooperation among the states themselves. To promote inter-state comity, the Constitution establishes several provisions:

    1. Adjudication of Inter-State Water Disputes: Article 262 facilitates the resolution of disputes related to the use, distribution, and control of waters from inter-state rivers.
    2. Coordination Through Inter-State Councils: These councils are designed to facilitate discussions and cooperation between states.
    3. Mutual Recognition of Public Acts: States are required to give full faith and credit to public acts, records, and judicial proceedings from other states.
    4. Freedom of Inter-State Trade: States have the liberty to engage in trade, commerce, and intercourse with one another without restrictions.

 

Additionally, Parliament established Zonal Councils to further enhance inter-state cooperation and coordination.

Inter-State Water Disputes

Article 262 provides the framework for adjudicating inter-state water disputes through two key provisions:

    1. Parliament can legislate to adjudicate disputes regarding the use, distribution, and control of waters pertaining to inter-state rivers and river valleys.
    2. Parliament may also stipulate that the Supreme Court or any other court will not exercise jurisdiction over such disputes or complaints.

 

In line with this provision, two laws have been enacted: the River Boards Act (1956) and the Inter-State Water Disputes Act (1956). The River Boards Act allows for establishing river boards at the request of concerned state governments to advise on the regulation and development of inter-state river systems.

       The Inter-State Water Disputes Act empowers the Central government to form an ad hoc tribunal to resolve disputes among states about inter-state river waters. The tribunal’s decisions are final and binding, and neither the Supreme Court nor any other court can intervene in matters referred to the tribunal.

      The need for such a specialized adjudicative mechanism stem from the fact that while the Supreme Court could adjudicate disputes involving legal rights or interests, the complexities of public interests in water supply management necessitate dedicated mechanisms beyond private proprietary interests.

     As of 2019, the Central government has established nine inter-state water dispute tribunals to address ongoing conflicts among states regarding water distribution.

       Here is the list of inter-state water disputes tribunals established by the Central government, along with their setup years and the states involved:

 

 

No.

Name of Tribunal

Set-up Year

States Involved

1

Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-I

1969

Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh

2

Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal

1969

Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha

3

Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal

1969

Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra

4

Ravi and Beas Water Disputes Tribunal

1986

Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan

5

Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal

1990

Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Puducherry

6

Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-II

2004

Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh

7

Vansadhara Water Disputes Tribunal

2010

Odisha and Andhra Pradesh

8

Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal

2010

Goa, Karnataka, and Maharashtra

9

Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal

2018

Odisha and Chhattisgarh

 

This table summarizes the key facts about the inter-state water disputes tribunals functioning in India.

Inter-State Councils

     Article 263 of the Indian Constitution allows for the establishment of an Inter-State Council to facilitate coordination between the states and between the Centre and the states. The President can create such a council if it appears to him that it would serve the public interest. He also has the authority to specify the council’s duties, organization, and procedures.

 

Though the President has discretion in defining the council’s duties, Article 263 outlines specific responsibilities, including:

(a) Investigating and advising on disputes that may arise between states,
(b) Exploring and discussing topics of mutual interest to the states or between the Centre and the states,

(c) Making recommendations to improve coordination of policy and action related to these subjects.

 

The council’s advisory function regarding inter-state disputes is complementary to the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under Article 131, which adjudicates legal controversies between governments. Unlike the binding decisions of the Supreme Court, the council’s role is advisory and can address both legal and non-legal disputes.

 

Under Article 263, the President has established several councils to improve policy and action coordination, including:

    • Central Council of Health and Family Welfare
    • Central Council of Local Government
    • Regional Councils for Sales Tax across Northern, Eastern, Western, and Southern Zones

Establishment of Inter-State Council

       The Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State Relations (1983–88) strongly advocated for a permanent Inter-State Council under Article 263. It recommended that this council should be referred to as the Inter-Governmental Council. The panel suggested that the council be tasked with duties specified in clauses (b) and (c) of Article 263.

 

Following these recommendations, the Janata Dal Government led by V. P. Singh established the Inter-State Council in 1990. Its composition includes:

    1. The Prime Minister as the Chairman
    2. Chief Ministers of all states
    3. Chief Ministers of union territories with legislative assemblies
    4. Administrators of union territories without legislative assemblies
    5. Governors of states under President’s Rule
    6. Six Central cabinet ministers, including the Home Minister, nominated by the Prime Minister.

 

Additionally, five cabinet-ranked ministers or Ministers of State (independent charge) are permanent invitees to the Council.

 

The Inter-State Council serves as a recommendatory body, focusing on issues related to inter-state relations, Centre-state relations, and Centre-union territory relations. Its primary duties include:

    • Investigating and discussing commonly shared subjects.
    • Making recommendations to enhance policy coordination and action.
    • Deliberating on other matters of general interest referred by the Chairman.

 

The Council meets at least three times a year, with meetings held in camera and decisions made by consensus. There is also a Standing Committee of the Council, established in 1996, which facilitates ongoing consultation and processes matters for the Council’s consideration. This committee includes:

    1. The union Home minister as the Chairman
    2. Five Union Cabinet Ministers
    3. Nine Chief Ministers

 

The Council is supported by a secretariat known as the Inter-State Council Secretariat, created in 1991 and headed by a secretary appointed by the Government of India. Since 2011, it has also functioned as the secretariat for the Zonal Councils.

Public Acts, Records, and Judicial Proceedings

      The Indian Constitution delineates that the jurisdiction of each state is confined to its own territory, which can lead to situations where the acts and records of one state might not be recognized in another. To address this issue, the Constitution incorporates a “Full Faith and Credit” clause that outlines the following provisions:

 

Recognition of Acts and Records:

    • Full faith and credit must be given throughout India to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of the Centre and every state. The term “public acts” encompasses both legislative and executive actions taken by the government. “Public record” includes any official documentation, such as books, registers, or records created by public servants in the course of fulfilling their official responsibilities.

 

Proof and Effect of Acts:

    • The conditions under which these acts, records, and proceedings must be proven, as well as the effects thereof, are governed by laws enacted by Parliament. This means that while the general rule requires recognition, Parliament retains the authority to specify how such acts and records should be proved and their legal effects when recognized in other states.

 

Execution of Civil Judgments:

    • Final judgments and orders from civil courts issued anywhere in India are enforceable throughout the country without the need for a new suit based on the judgment. This rule is limited to civil judgments and does not extend to criminal judgments, meaning that courts are not required to enforce the penal laws of one state in another.

Inter-State Trade and Commerce

    1. Articles 301 to 307 in Part XIII of the Indian Constitution focus on trade, commerce, and intercourse throughout the territory of India. Article 301 states that trade, commerce, and intercourse shall be free across the entire nation. This provision aims to eliminate border barriers between states, fostering a unified market that facilitates the free flow of trade and commerce. The freedom granted extends to both interstate and intrastate trade, commerce, and intercourse, meaning that restrictions are impermissible not only at state borders but also at any prior or subsequent stages.
    2. The freedom guaranteed by Article 301 is unrestricted except for limitations specified in Articles 302 to 305 of the Constitution. These limitations include:
          • Parliamentary Restrictions: Parliament can impose restrictions on trade, commerce, and intercourse between states or within a state in the interest of the public. However, it cannot favor one state over another or discriminate between states, unless there is a shortage of goods in any part of India.
          • State Legislative Restrictions: State legislatures may impose reasonable restrictions on trade, commerce, and intercourse within the state, but any bill to this effect must have prior approval from the President. Additionally, state legislatures cannot prefer one state over another or discriminate between them.
          • Taxation on Imported Goods: State legislatures can impose taxes on goods imported from other states or union territories, provided that these taxes are consistent with those applied to similar goods produced within the state. This provision prevents discriminatory taxation practices by the states.
          • Subject to Nationalization Laws: The freedom under Article 301 is subject to nationalization laws that may establish monopolies in favor of the Centre or the states. Consequently, both Parliament and state legislatures may enact laws to manage any trade, business, industry, or service, potentially excluding citizens or others.

 

Parliament has the authority to designate an appropriate authority to implement these provisions relating to the freedom of trade, commerce, and intercourse, as well as to manage any restrictions. However, as of now, no such authority has been appointed.

 

Zonal Councils

Zonal Councils are statutory bodies, established by the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, rather than being created by the Constitution. This Act divided India into five zones: Northern, Central, Eastern, Western, and Southern, with a zonal council designated for each area.

Factors considered in forming these zones included natural divisions of the country, river systems, means of communication, cultural and linguistic affinities, and the needs for economic development, security, and law and order.

Each zonal council comprises the following members:

    • Home Minister of the Central government
    • Chief Ministers of all states within the zone
    • Two additional ministers from each state in the zone
    • Administrators of each union territory in the zone

Advisory roles can be filled by:

    • A nominee from the Planning Commission
    • Chief Secretaries of each state’s government in the zone
    • Development Commissioners of each state in the zone

The Home Minister serves as the common chairman of all five zonal councils, while each Chief Minister takes turns acting as vice-chairman for a one-year term.

Objectives and Functions of Zonal Councils

The primary aim of the zonal councils is to promote cooperation and coordination among the states, union territories, and the Centre. They provide a platform for discussions and recommendations on topics such as economic and social planning, linguistic minorities, border disputes, and interstate transport. Their role is deliberative and advisory.

Key objectives include:

    • Achieving emotional integration of the country.
    • Mitigating extreme state-consciousness, regionalism, and linguistic particularism.
    • Addressing the after-effects of separation in some cases to facilitate reorganization, integration, and economic advancement.
    • Encouraging cooperation between the Centre and states on social and economic matters and fostering the development of uniform policies.
    • Collaborating on the efficient execution of major development projects.
    • Securing political equilibrium among different regions.

North-Eastern Council

In addition to the Zonal Councils, the North-Eastern Council was established by the North-Eastern Council Act of 1971. This council comprises members from Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Sikkim. Its functions closely resemble those of the zonal councils but include some additional responsibilities, such as formulating a unified regional plan on matters of common significance and periodically reviewing security and public order measures implemented by the member states.

Zonal Councils at a Glance

NameMembersHeadquarters
Northern Zonal CouncilHimachal Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, Delhi, Chandigarh, Jammu and Kashmir, LadakhNew Delhi
Central Zonal CouncilUttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya PradeshAllahabad
Eastern Zonal CouncilBihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, OdishaKolkata
Western Zonal CouncilGujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and DiuMumbai
Southern Zonal CouncilAndhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, PuducherryChennai