TOne Academy

Historical Background

Home / Polity / Historical Background

The British arrived in India in 1600 as traders under the East India Company, which was granted exclusive trading rights in India through a charter issued by Queen Elizabeth I. In 1765, the Company transitioned from being purely a trading entity to a territorial power by acquiring the ‘diwani’—the rights over revenue collection and civil justice—for Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa.

Following the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, the British Crown took direct control of India’s governance in 1858, marking the end of the East India Company’s rule. This period of British Crown rule continued until India achieved independence on August 15, 1947.

 

With India’s Independence came the necessity for a Constitution to govern the newly formed nation. To fulfill this purpose, a Constituent Assembly was established in 1946, and on January 26, 1950, the Constitution of India came into effect.

However, several features of the Indian Constitution and polity trace their origins back to British rule. Certain significant events during the British era laid the legal foundation for the organization and functioning of government and administration in British India. These events have profoundly influenced the Indian Constitution and its political framework.

These developments are presented in chronological order under two major headings:

  1. The Company Rule (1773–1858)
  2. The Crown Rule (1858–1947)

 

The Company Rule (1773–1858)

Regulating Act of 1773

The Regulating Act of 1773 holds great constitutional importance as it:

  1. Marked the first step by the British Government to control and regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India.
  2. Recognized, for the first time, the political and administrative functions of the Company.
  3. Laid the foundation for central administration in India.

Key Features of the Act:

  1. The Governor of Bengal was designated as the ‘Governor-General of Bengal,’ and an Executive Council of four members was established to assist him. The first Governor-General of Bengal was Lord Warren Hastings.
  2. The governors of the Bombay and Madras presidencies were made subordinate to the Governor-General of Bengal. Previously, the three presidencies operated independently of one another.
  3. The Act provided for the establishment of a Supreme Court at Calcutta (1774), consisting of one Chief Justice and three other judges.
  4. It prohibited the servants of the Company from engaging in private trade or accepting presents or bribes from the local population.
  5. The Act strengthened the British Government’s control over the East India Company by requiring the Court of Directors (the Company’s governing body) to report regularly on its revenue, civil, and military affairs in India.

This Act laid the groundwork for subsequent administrative and judicial reforms in India.

Amending Act of 1781 (Act of Settlement)

To address the shortcomings of the Regulating Act of 1773, the British Parliament enacted the Amending Act of 1781, also known as the Act of Settlement. This Act aimed to resolve issues related to jurisdiction and governance.

Key Features of the Act:

  1. Exemption from Supreme Court Jurisdiction:
    • The Governor-General and the Council were exempted from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for actions performed in their official capacity.
    • Similarly, the servants of the East India Company were exempted from the court’s jurisdiction for their official actions.
  2. Exclusion of Revenue Matters:
    • Matters related to revenue and revenue collection were excluded from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
  3. Jurisdiction over Calcutta Inhabitants:
    • The Supreme Court was given jurisdiction over all the inhabitants of Calcutta.
    • The court was directed to administer the personal law of the defendants: Hindus were to be tried according to Hindu law, and Muslims according to Mohammedan law.
  4. Appeals Process:
    • Appeals from Provincial Courts were to be directed to the Governor-General-in-Council, rather than to the Supreme Court.
  5. Regulations for Provincial Courts:
    • The Governor-General-in-Council was empowered to frame regulations for the functioning of Provincial Courts and Councils.

The Amending Act of 1781 was a critical step in resolving jurisdictional conflicts and establishing a more coherent governance structure in British India.

Pitt’s India Act of 1784

The Pitt’s India Act of 1784 was a significant legislative measure passed by the British Parliament to address the shortcomings of earlier governance structures and to ensure better administration in India.

Key Features of the Act:

  1. Separation of Functions:
    • The Act distinguished between the commercial and political functions of the East India Company.
  2. Double Government System:
    • The Court of Directors was entrusted with the management of the Company’s commercial affairs.
    • A new body, the Board of Control, was established to oversee and manage the political affairs of the Company.
  3. Supervisory Powers of the Board of Control:
    • The Board of Control was empowered to supervise and direct all operations related to the civil, military, and revenue matters of the British possessions in India.

Significance of the Act:

  • The Company’s territories in India were, for the first time, officially referred to as the ‘British possessions in India’.
  • The Act marked the beginning of supreme control by the British Government over the East India Company’s affairs and its administration in India.

The Pitt’s India Act of 1784 played a pivotal role in strengthening British control over India and laid the foundation for the dual administration system.

Act of 1786

The Act of 1786 was enacted to accommodate the specific demands of Lord Cornwallis before accepting the post of Governor-General of Bengal.

Key Provisions:

  1. The Governor-General was granted the power to override the decisions of his Council in special cases.
  2. The Governor-General was also designated as the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.

Charter Act of 1793

The Charter Act of 1793 introduced several important provisions related to governance and trade.

Key Features of the Act:

  1. Extension of Overriding Power:
    • The overriding power granted to Lord Cornwallis over his Council was extended to all future Governor-Generals and Governors of Presidencies.
  2. Enhanced Authority of the Governor-General:
    • The Governor-General was given more powers and greater control over the subordinate Presidencies of Bombay and Madras.
  3. Trade Monopoly Extension:
    • The trade monopoly of the East India Company in India was extended for another period of twenty years.
  4. Commander-in-Chief and the Council:
    • The Act stipulated that the Commander-in-Chief would not be a member of the Governor-General’s Council unless he was specifically appointed to that position.
  5. Payment from Indian Revenues:
    • It was mandated that the members of the Board of Control and their staff were to be paid from the Indian revenues.

These provisions aimed to streamline governance and reinforce the authority of the British administration in India.

Charter Act of 1813

The Charter Act of 1813 introduced significant changes to the governance and trade policies of the East India Company.

Key Features:

  1. Abolition of Trade Monopoly:
    • The Company’s trade monopoly in India was abolished, opening Indian trade to all British merchants.
    • However, the Company retained its monopoly over trade in tea and trade with China.
  2. Assertion of Sovereignty:
    • The Act affirmed the sovereignty of the British Crown over the Company’s territories in India.
  3. Encouragement of Missionaries:
    • It allowed Christian missionaries to enter India for the purpose of enlightening the people.
  4. Spread of Western Education:
    • It provided for the promotion of western education among the inhabitants of the British territories in India.
  5. Taxation Powers:
    • The Act authorized Local Governments in India to impose taxes on individuals and to penalize those who failed to pay these taxes.

Charter Act of 1853

This was the last of the series of Charter Acts passed by the British Parliament between 1793 and 1853. It was a significant constitutional landmark.

The features of this Act were as follows:

  1. It separated, for the first time, the legislative and executive functions of the Governor-General’s council. It provided for addition of six new members called legislative councillors to the council. In other words, it established a separate Governor-General’s legislative council which came to be known as the Indian (Central) Legislative Council. This legislative wing of the council functioned as a mini-Parliament, adopting the same procedures as the British Parliament. Thus, legislation, for the first time, was treated as a special function of the government, requiring special machinery and special process.
  2. It introduced an open competition system of selection and recruitment of civil servants. The covenanted civil service was, thus, thrown open to the Indians also. Accordingly, the Macaulay Committee (the Committee on the Indian Civil Service) was appointed in 1854.
  3. It extended the Company’s rule and allowed it to retain the possession of Indian territories on trust for the British Crown. But, it did not specify any particular period, unlike the previous Charters. This was a clear indication that the Company’s rule could be terminated at any time the Parliament liked.
  4. It introduced, for the first time, local representation in the Indian (Central) Legislative Council. Of the six new legislative members of the Governor-General’s council, four members were appointed by the local (provincial) governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal and Agra.

THE CROWN RULE (1858–1947)

Government of India Act of 1858

The Government of India Act of 1858 was enacted in the aftermath of the Revolt of 1857, also known as the First War of Independence or the Sepoy Mutiny. Known as the Act for the Good Government of India, it abolished the East India Company and transferred all powers of governance, territories, and revenues to the British Crown.

Key Features of the Act:

  1. Governance under the British Crown:
    • India was to be governed in the name of Her Majesty.
    • The designation of the Governor-General of India was changed to the Viceroy of India, making him the direct representative of the British Crown in India.
    • Lord Canning became the first Viceroy of India.
  2. Abolition of Double Government:
    • The Board of Control and the Court of Directors were abolished, ending the system of double government.
  3. Creation of the Secretary of State for India:
    • A new office, the Secretary of State for India, was established, with complete authority and control over Indian administration.
    • The Secretary of State was a member of the British Cabinet and was responsible to the British Parliament.
  4. Council of India:
    • A 15-member Council of India was created to assist the Secretary of State. This council served as an advisory body, with the Secretary of State acting as its Chairman.
  5. Legal Entity:
    • The Secretary of State-in-Council was constituted as a corporate body, capable of suing and being sued both in India and England.

While the Act of 1858 focused on improving the administrative machinery and the supervision of Indian governance in England, it did not introduce significant changes to the system of government operating within India.

Historical Background

hello start the quiz

You must specify a text.
The Industrial Revolution not only revolutionized production but also fueled the expansion of European colonialism." Discuss the interconnectedness of industrial growth and imperialism.

Introduction
The Industrial Revolution, which began in the late 18th century, was a transformative period that reshaped production methods through technological advancements and mass manufacturing. This revolution not only revolutionized production but also had a profound impact on global politics, driving European powers to expand their colonial empires. The need for raw materials, new markets, and labor to sustain industrial growth led to the intensification of European colonialism.

Body

1. The Industrial Revolution and the Transformation of Production

  1. Technological Advancements:
    The invention of the steam engine by James Watt and innovations in textile production significantly boosted manufacturing capacities. Factories began mass-producing goods at faster rates, and technological improvements like machine tools and mass production techniques lowered production costs, making goods more affordable and accessible.
    Innovations in transportation, such as steamships and railways, further enhanced the efficiency of moving raw materials, accelerating industrial production.
  2. Shift in Economic Structures:
    The rise of factories and the decline of traditional cottage industries marked a shift from agrarian economies to urban, industrial economies. This transformation fostered the growth of urban centers and the rise of a new industrial working class. Industries like textiles, iron, and steel grew rapidly, requiring large-scale production systems to meet the demands of global markets.
  3. Increased Productivity:
    Advances such as the spinning jenny and power loom revolutionized textile production, allowing Britain to dominate the global textile trade. Mass production techniques, such as interchangeable parts, facilitated the assembly of complex goods like machinery, tools, and transport vehicles, further propelling industrial growth.

2. The Industrial Revolution and the Expansion of European Colonialism

  1. Demand for Raw Materials:
    The Industrial Revolution created an insatiable demand for raw materials, such as cotton, rubber, oil, and minerals. European powers turned to their colonies—India, Africa, and Southeast Asia—to supply these resources. For instance, India became a key supplier of cotton for Britain’s textile mills, while rubber from Africa contributed to the growing automobile and industrial sectors in Europe.
  2. New Markets for Manufactured Goods:
    European powers sought new markets for their mass-produced goods, and their colonies became captive markets for these products. This trade dynamic ensured that the wealth generated from industrial production flowed back to the imperial powers. Local industries in colonies were often undermined by the influx of European manufactured goods, such as textiles, while colonies were coerced into purchasing European products due to imperial trade policies, such as the British East India Company’s monopoly in India.
  3. Technological Advancements and Imperial Control:
    Steamships, railroads, and telegraph lines played a crucial role in expanding European territorial control over distant colonies. These innovations facilitated the movement of troops, supplies, and resources, enabling more effective governance and exploitation. Additionally, military technologies like the Maxim gun gave European powers a decisive advantage in suppressing local resistance, securing imperial dominance.
  4. Exploitation of Labor:
    The demand for cheap labor driven by industrial growth led European powers to exploit colonial populations. In India, indentured servitude became widespread, with workers subjected to long-term, exploitative labor contracts in plantations and construction projects, such as the railway system. This form of labor exploitation contributed to the wealth of the imperial powers while reinforcing the colonial economic structure.

Conclusion
The Industrial Revolution revolutionized global production methods and spurred the expansion of European colonialism, as industrial powers sought to secure raw materials, markets, and labor. This interconnectedness between industrial growth and imperialism not only reshaped the global economy but also laid the foundation for enduring global inequalities that continue to affect the modern world.

Discuss the complex interactions between cultural regeneration and political resistance in the Indian nationalist movement.

Introduction
The Indian nationalist movement, spanning the 19th and 20th centuries, was not merely a political effort against British colonial rule but also a profound cultural renaissance. This cultural revival aimed at reclaiming and redefining India’s identity and heritage, thereby strengthening the foundations of political resistance. The relationship between cultural regeneration and political resistance was mutually reinforcing, with each driving the other forward.

Body

1. Cultural Regeneration as the Foundation of Political Resistance

  1. Rediscovery of India’s Cultural Heritage:
    Indian reformers and scholars played a significant role in reviving and promoting the country’s ancient cultural and philosophical traditions. Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Swami Vivekananda sought to reintroduce the teachings of ancient texts, fostering a sense of national pride.
    Example: Dayananda Saraswati and the Arya Samaj advocated for a return to Vedic values, framing it as a rejection of the colonial imposition on Indian culture.

  2. The Bengal Renaissance and Nationalism:
    The Bengal Renaissance, spearheaded by thinkers like Rabindranath Tagore and Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, integrated cultural revival with nationalist ideas. Their works encouraged a resurgence of Indian consciousness.
    Example: Bankim Chandra’s Anandamath, which introduced “Vande Mataram” as a national symbol, became a rallying cry for the nationalist movement.

  3. Education as a Catalyst for Cultural Renewal:
    Institutions like Banaras Hindu University (BHU), founded by Madan Mohan Malaviya, combined modern education with Indian traditional values, strengthening the intellectual foundation for political resistance.
    Leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak used educational initiatives to cultivate a sense of national identity and to promote resistance against British colonial rule.

  4. Integration of Folk Culture into the Nationalist Struggle:
    Folk songs, stories, and symbols, which were vital parts of India’s rural traditions, became instrumental in mobilizing the masses for the nationalist cause.
    Example: The bhajan Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram, popularized by Mahatma Gandhi, became a unifying anthem that resonated with people across regions and communities.

2. Political Resistance Fueling Cultural Revival

  1. Religious Symbolism in Political Mobilization:
    Political leaders effectively utilized cultural and religious symbolism to stir nationalist sentiment and unite people across India.
    Example: Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s promotion of Ganesh Chaturthi as a public festival served not only to celebrate Indian culture but also to foster a sense of unity and pride among the masses.

  2. Countering British Cultural Hegemony:
    The nationalist movement sought to challenge the British narrative that portrayed Indians as “uncivilized” and inferior. Cultural narratives highlighting India’s rich heritage became essential in building pride in India’s past.
    Example: Swami Vivekananda’s speech at the 1893 Chicago Parliament of Religions emphasized India’s spiritual depth, positioning Indian culture as intellectually and morally superior, thus empowering political resistance.

Conclusion
The Indian nationalist movement was a powerful fusion of cultural regeneration and political resistance. Cultural revival instilled a sense of pride and unity, which invigorated the political struggle against British rule. Conversely, the political resistance provided the necessary urgency and platform for cultural renewal, ensuring its broad reach. This synergy between culture and politics laid the foundation for India’s eventual independence.

Historical Background

1. Regulating Act , 1973

2. Pitts India Act , 1984