In 1600, the East India Company, which was granted an exclusive trading charter by Queen Elizabeth I, brought the British to India as traders. When the Company began to exercise territorial control in 1765, it moved away from its trade position and obtained the “diwani”—the rights to revenue and civil justice—in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The British Crown assumed direct control of India’s government in 1858 after the Sepoy Mutiny, and this arrangement lasted until August 15, 1947, when India gained independence.
Indian Independence necessitated the drafting of a constitution. In order to address this need, a Constituent Assembly was formed in 1946, and on January 26, 1950, the Constitution was adopted.
Since several significant events during this time created the legal framework for the governance and administration of British India, many elements of the Indian Constitution and political system have their roots in British rule. These noteworthy occurrences are discussed in chronological order under two main headings:
Since it was the first move the British Government took to regulate and supervise the East India Company’s operations in India, the Regulating Act of 1773 was noteworthy for its constitutional implications.
It established the foundation for central administration in India and was the first legislation to recognize the Company’s political and administrative responsibilities.
To address the shortcomings of the Regulating Act of 1773, the British Parliament enacted the Amending Act of 1781, also known as the Act of Settlement.
The Pitt’s India Act2 of 1784 was the following significant law. This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
Therefore, the legislation was noteworthy for two reasons: first, the Company’s Indian lands were referred to as “British possessions in India” for the first time; and second, the British Government was granted complete authority over the management of the company’s operations in India.
Lord Cornwallis was named Governor-General of Bengal in 1786. In order to accept that position, he made two demands:
He ought to have the authority to overrule his council’s judgment in certain circumstances.
In addition, he would serve as Commander-in-Chief.
As a result, both provisions were made by the Act of 1786.
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
In British India, this Act was the last step toward centralization.
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
The British Parliament passed a number of Charter Acts between 1793 and 1853, this being the final one. It was an important turning point in the constitution.
Following the Revolt of 1857 commonly referred to as the First War of Independence or the “sepoy mutiny,” this important Act was passed. The legislation referred to as the Good Government Act of
India, disbanded the East India Company, and gave the British Crown control over the country’s lands, government, and income.
The Act of 1858 primarily focused on enhancing the administrative structure that oversaw the Indian Government from England. It did not bring about significant changes to the existing system of government in India.
Following the significant revolt of 1857, the British Government recognized the need to enlist the cooperation of Indians in the administration of their country. To move towards this goal of inclusion, three acts were enacted by the British Parliament in 1861, 1892, and 1909. The Indian Councils Act of 1861 serves as a crucial milestone in the constitutional and political history of India.
These features reflect the significant steps taken towards inclusivity and governance reform in colonial India.
The Indian Councils Act of 1892 introduced several important features aimed at enhancing the legislative framework in India. The key provisions of this Act are as follows:
-The Viceroy could nominate some non-official members to the Central Legislative Council based on recommendations from the provincial legislative councils and the Bengal Chamber of Commerce.
– Governors could nominate members to the provincial legislative councils based on recommendations from various local bodies, including district boards, municipalities, universities, trade associations, zamindars, and chambers of commerce.
While the Act included a limited provision for using elections to fill some non-official seats in both the Central and provincial legislative councils, it did not explicitly use the term “election.” Instead, the process was characterized as nominations made on the recommendation of specific bodies.
These provisions represented a gradual move towards greater Indian participation in governance while still maintaining British control over the legislative process.
The Indian Councils Act of 1909, commonly referred to as the Morley-Minto Reforms (named after then Secretary of State for India, Lord Morley, and then Viceroy of India, Lord Minto), introduced several crucial features:
On August 20, 1917, the British Government announced its aim to gradually introduce responsible government in India. This led to the enactment of the Government of India Act of 1919, which came into effect in 1921 and is also known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (named after Montagu, the Secretary of State for India, and Lord Chelmsford, the Viceroy of India).
The Act reduced central control over the provinces by delineating and separating central and provincial subjects. Both central and provincial legislatures were authorized to legislate on their respective lists of subjects. However, the overall structure of government remained centralized and unitary in nature.
These Acts represented significant steps in the evolution of constitutional development and governance in India, marking a shift toward greater Indian participation in the political process.
The Act further categorized provincial subjects into two types—transferred and reserved. Transferred subjects were to be managed by the Governor with the assistance of Ministers who were accountable to the legislative council. In contrast, reserved subjects were to be administered solely by the Governor and his executive council, without any accountability to the legislative council. This dual governance structure was termed ‘dyarchy,’ originating from the Greek word “dyarchy,” meaning double rule. However, this system proved largely ineffective.
For the first time, the Act introduced bicameralism and direct elections in India. The Indian legislative council was replaced by a bicameral legislature, comprising an Upper House (Council of State) and a Lower House (Legislative Assembly). Most members of both Houses were elected directly by the electorate.
The Act stipulated that three of the six members of the Viceroy’s executive council (excluding the Commander-in-Chief) would be Indians.
The principle of communal representation was expanded under the Act, providing for separate electorates for Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans.
The Act granted voting rights to a limited segment of the population based on criteria such as property ownership, tax payments, or educational qualifications.
A new office, the High Commissioner for India, was created in London, taking over some functions previously performed by the Secretary of State for India.
The Act mandated the establishment of a public service commission, leading to the creation of the Central Public Service Commission in 1926 for the recruitment of civil servants.
For the first time, provincial budgets were separated from the central budget, allowing provincial legislatures to enact their own budgets.
The Act provided for the establishment of a statutory commission to review its functioning and report on the effectiveness of the Act after ten years of its implementation.
These features marked significant changes in the governance structure in India, laying the groundwork for increased Indian participation in the political process and introducing reforms aimed at creating a more representative system.
In November 1927, two years ahead of the scheduled date, the British Government announced the establishment of a seven-member statutory commission chaired by Sir John Simon. The purpose of the commission was to assess the situation in India under its new Constitution. Notably, all members of the commission were British, which led to a boycott from all Indian political parties. The commission submitted its report in 1930, which recommended several changes, including:
– The abolition of dyarchy.
– The extension of responsible government in the provinces.
– The establishment of a federation encompassing both British India and the princely states.
– The continuation of communal electorates.
To discuss and evaluate the commission’s proposals, the British Government organized three round table conferences, bringing together representatives from the British Government, British India, and Indian princely states. Following these discussions, a “White Paper on Constitutional Reforms” was prepared and submitted to the Joint Select Committee of the British Parliament. The recommendations put forth by this committee were subsequently incorporated, with some amendments, into the Government of India Act of 1935.
In August 1932, Ramsay MacDonald, the British Prime Minister, introduced a plan for the representation of minorities known as the Communal Award. This award not only maintained separate electorates for Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans but also extended this provision to the depressed classes (Scheduled Castes). Mahatma Gandhi was deeply disheartened by this expansion of communal representation to the depressed classes and undertook a fast unto death in Yerawada Jail (Pune) to advocate for a modification of the award.
Ultimately, an agreement was reached between the leaders of the Congress and the representatives of the depressed classes, known as the Poona Pact. This agreement preserved the Hindu joint electorate and allocated reserved seats for the depressed classes.
The Government of India Act of 1935 is regarded as a significant milestone towards establishing a more responsible government in India. It was an extensive and detailed document comprising 321 sections and 10 schedules, outlining various aspects of governance and institutional structure in India.
The Act proposed an All-India Federation comprising provinces and princely states as units. Powers were divided between the Centre and the units through three lists: the Federal List (containing 59 items for the Centre), the Provincial List (54 items for the provinces), and the Concurrent List (36 items for both). Residuary powers were assigned to the Viceroy. However, the federation was never realized as the princely states chose not to participate.
The Act abolished dyarchy and introduced ‘provincial autonomy.’ Provinces were empowered to act as autonomous administrative units within defined areas. Additionally, responsible government was instituted in provinces, which required the Governor to act upon the advice of ministers accountable to the provincial legislature. This arrangement was operational from 1937 until its discontinuation in 1939.
The Act proposed the reintroduction of dyarchy at the Centre, dividing federal subjects into reserved subjects and transferred subjects. However, this provision did not come into effect.
Bicameral legislatures were established in six of the eleven provinces, specifically Bengal, Bombay, Madras, Bihar, Assam, and the United Provinces. These legislatures comprised a legislative council (upper house) and a legislative assembly (lower house), though significant restrictions were placed on their functions.
The Act expanded the principle of communal representation by providing separate electorates for the depressed classes (Scheduled Castes), women, and labourers.
The Council of India, established by the Government of India Act of 1858, was abolished, and the Secretary of State for India was supported by a team of advisors.
The Act broadened the voting rights, extending them to roughly 10 percent of the total population.
The Act provided for the creation of the Reserve Bank of India to manage the currency and credit of the nation.
It established a Federal Public Service Commission, as well as Provincial Public Service Commissions and a Joint Public Service Commission for two or more provinces.
The Act provided for the creation of a Federal Court, which was established in 1937.
On February 20, 1947, British Prime Minister Clement Attlee announced that British rule in India would cease by June 30, 1948, after which power would be transferred to responsible Indian leaders. This announcement was met with heightened agitation from the Muslim League, which demanded the partition of the country. On June 3, 1947, the British Government clarified that any Constitution drafted by the Constituent Assembly (formed in 1946) would not be applicable in areas unwilling to accept it. On the same day, Lord Mountbatten, the Viceroy of India, proposed the partition plan, known as the Mountbatten Plan, which was accepted by both the Congress and the Muslim League. The plan was promptly enacted through the Indian Independence Act of 1947.
These provisions marked a pivotal moment in Indian history, culminating in the establishment of independent governance in India and Pakistan.
At the stroke of midnight on August 14-15, 1947, British rule officially ended, and power was transferred to the two newly independent Dominions of India and Pakistan. Lord Mountbatten became the first Governor-General of the Dominion of India, swearing in Jawaharlal Nehru as its first Prime Minister. The Constituent Assembly of India, formed in 1946, subsequently became the Parliament of the Indian Dominion.
The Interim Government of India was formed in 1946 with various key members taking on specific portfolios. Below is a list of the members and the portfolios they held:
Sl. No. | Members | Portfolios Held |
1 | Jawaharlal Nehru | Vice-President of the Council; External Affairs & Commonwealth Relations |
2 | Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel | Home, Information & Broadcasting |
3 | Dr. Rajendra Prasad | Food & Agriculture |
4 | Dr. John Mathai | Industries & Supplies |
5 | Jagjivan Ram | Labour |
6 | Sardar Baldev Singh | Defence |
7 | C.H. Bhabha | Works, Mines & Power |
8 | Liaquat Ali Khan | Finance |
9 | Abdur Rab Nishtar | Posts & Air |
10 | Asaf Ali | Railways & Transport |
11 | C. Rajagopalachari | Education & Arts |
12 | I.I. Chundrigar | Commerce |
13 | Ghaznafar Ali Khan | Health |
14 | Joginder Nath Mandal | Law |
Note: The members of the Interim Government also served on the Viceroy’s Executive Council. The Viceroy remained the head of this council, while Jawaharlal Nehru held the position of Vice-President of the Council.
The first Cabinet of Free India was formed in 1947 following India’s independence. Below is a list of the cabinet members along with their respective portfolios:
This cabinet played a crucial role in shaping the policies and direction of India as it embarked on its journey of independence and self-governance.Bottom of Form