Fundamental Rights are enshrined in Part III of the Indian Constitution, covering Articles 12 to 35. The framers of the Constitution drew inspiration from the United States Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights. Part III of the Constitution is often referred to as the “Magna Carta of India” due to its comprehensive and detailed list of justiciable rights.
These rights are considered more extensive than those found in the constitutions of many other countries, including the U.S. Fundamental Rights are guaranteed to all individuals regardless of discrimination, promoting the equality of all, preserving individual dignity, and supporting the public interest and national unity.
The purpose of these rights is to uphold the principles of political democracy and prevent the establishment of authoritarian rule. They safeguard individual liberties and freedoms against violations by the state, acting as checks on potential executive tyranny and arbitrary laws enacted by the legislature. Essentially, they aim to establish “a government of laws and not of men.”
The term “Fundamental Rights” reflects their guaranteed protection by the Constitution, which serves as the fundamental law of the land. These rights are also termed “fundamental” because they are crucial for the all-round development of individuals—material, intellectual, moral, and spiritual.
Initially, the Constitution recognized seven Fundamental Rights:
However, the Right to Property was removed from the list of Fundamental Rights by the 44th Amendment Act in 1978, and is now recognized as a legal right under Article 300-A in Part XII of the Constitution. As a result, there are currently six Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.
The Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution are characterized by several key features:
These features highlight the significance of Fundamental Rights in protecting individual liberties while also allowing for the governance necessary to maintain social order and public interest.
Definition of State
In the context of the Indian Constitution, the term “State” is used in various provisions related to Fundamental Rights. Article 12 specifically defines “State” for the purposes of Part III of the Constitution. According to this article, the term “State” comprises the following entities:
The definition of “State” is thus broad and inclusive, ensuring that all agencies and bodies acting on behalf of the government are encompassed within this term. Actions taken by these agencies can be contested in court if they are believed to violate Fundamental Rights.
Additionally, the Supreme Court has clarified that even private bodies or agencies functioning as instruments of the State fall under the definition of “State” as outlined in Article 12. This broad interpretation allows for comprehensive protection of Fundamental Rights against various forms of authority.
Article 13 of the Indian Constitution states that any law that contradicts or undermines any Fundamental Rights shall be declared void. This article explicitly establishes the principle of judicial review, granting the Supreme Court (under Article 32) and the High Courts (under Article 226) the authority to declare laws unconstitutional and invalid if they violate Fundamental Rights.
The definition of “law” in Article 13 includes a broad range of legal provisions, encompassing the following:
As a result, not only legislative enactments but also the aforementioned types of laws can be challenged in court for violating Fundamental Rights and can, therefore, be declared void.
Moreover, Article 13 specifies that constitutional amendments do not fall within the definition of “law” and, as such, cannot be challenged. However, in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), the Supreme Court ruled that a constitutional amendment may indeed be subject to challenge if it infringes upon a Fundamental Right that is considered part of the “basic structure” of the Constitution, thus making it void.
This ruling underscore the significance of Fundamental Rights in the constitutional framework and affirms the judiciary’s role in protecting those rights against any potential infringement through legislation or constitutional amendments.
Here is an overview of the Fundamental Rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution, categorized by their respective articles:
This overview elucidates the fundamental rights that safeguard individual freedoms and liberties in India, ensuring equality, justice, and protection from exploitation.
Fundamental Rights (FR) of Foreigners
The Fundamental Rights in India primarily apply to citizens, but certain rights are also accessible to foreigners (excluding enemy aliens). Below is a summary of Fundamental Rights categorized into those available only to citizens and those available to both citizens and foreigners:
Fundamental Rights Available Only to Citizens
– (i) Speech and expression
– (ii) Assembly
– (iii) Association
– (iv) Movement
– (v) Residence
– (vi) Profession (Article 19).
Fundamental Rights Available to Both Citizens and Foreigners (Except Enemy Aliens)
Rights Specific to Labor and Religion (Available to All):
1. Prohibition of Human Trafficking: Prohibition of trafficking in human beings and forced labor (Article 23).
2. Child Employment: Prohibition of employment of children in factories and other hazardous occupations (Article 24).
3. Freedom of Religion:
– Freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice, and propagate religion (Article 25).
– Freedom to manage religious affairs (Article 26).
– Freedom from taxation for the promotion of any religion (Article 27).
– Freedom from attending religious instruction or worship in certain educational institutions (Article 28).
This categorization illustrates the distinct framework for Fundamental Rights in India, highlighting the privileges afforded to citizens while ensuring some protections extend to non-citizens as well.
Right to Equality
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution states that the State shall not deny any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. This provision applies to all individuals, including both citizens and foreigners. The term “person” encompasses legal entities such as statutory corporations, companies, and registered societies.
The principle of “equality before law” has its roots in British law, while the concept of “equal protection of laws” is derived from the American Constitution. The former means:
Conversely, “equal protection of laws” entails:
Thus, while the first concept emphasizes the absence of privileges, the second focuses on equality of treatment. Both aim to establish a foundation of legal equality and justice.
The Supreme Court has determined that Article 14 does not apply when equals and unequals are treated differently. While it prohibits class legislation, it allows for reasonable classification of persons, objects, and transactions. However, this classification must not be arbitrary or artificial; it should be based on an intelligible criterion and a substantial distinction.
Rule of Law
The concept of “equality before law” is a fundamental aspect of the Rule of Law, as articulated by British jurist A.V. Dicey. His doctrine includes three essential components:
In the context of India, the first two elements are applicable, but the third is not. Here, the Constitution is regarded as the foundation of individual rights.
The Supreme Court has held that the Rule of Law, embodied in Article 14, is a “basic feature” of the Constitution and cannot be diminished even by constitutional amendments.
Exceptions to Equality
The principle of equality before the law is not absolute and certain constitutional exceptions exist:
These provisions illustrate how certain exceptions are designed to protect the functions of government officials while maintaining the principle of equality under the law.
Introduction
The Industrial Revolution, which began in the late 18th century, was a transformative period that reshaped production methods through technological advancements and mass manufacturing. This revolution not only revolutionized production but also had a profound impact on global politics, driving European powers to expand their colonial empires. The need for raw materials, new markets, and labor to sustain industrial growth led to the intensification of European colonialism.
Body
1. The Industrial Revolution and the Transformation of Production
2. The Industrial Revolution and the Expansion of European Colonialism
Conclusion
The Industrial Revolution revolutionized global production methods and spurred the expansion of European colonialism, as industrial powers sought to secure raw materials, markets, and labor. This interconnectedness between industrial growth and imperialism not only reshaped the global economy but also laid the foundation for enduring global inequalities that continue to affect the modern world.
Introduction
The Indian nationalist movement, spanning the 19th and 20th centuries, was not merely a political effort against British colonial rule but also a profound cultural renaissance. This cultural revival aimed at reclaiming and redefining India’s identity and heritage, thereby strengthening the foundations of political resistance. The relationship between cultural regeneration and political resistance was mutually reinforcing, with each driving the other forward.
Body
1. Cultural Regeneration as the Foundation of Political Resistance
Rediscovery of India’s Cultural Heritage:
Indian reformers and scholars played a significant role in reviving and promoting the country’s ancient cultural and philosophical traditions. Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Swami Vivekananda sought to reintroduce the teachings of ancient texts, fostering a sense of national pride.
Example: Dayananda Saraswati and the Arya Samaj advocated for a return to Vedic values, framing it as a rejection of the colonial imposition on Indian culture.
The Bengal Renaissance and Nationalism:
The Bengal Renaissance, spearheaded by thinkers like Rabindranath Tagore and Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, integrated cultural revival with nationalist ideas. Their works encouraged a resurgence of Indian consciousness.
Example: Bankim Chandra’s Anandamath, which introduced “Vande Mataram” as a national symbol, became a rallying cry for the nationalist movement.
Education as a Catalyst for Cultural Renewal:
Institutions like Banaras Hindu University (BHU), founded by Madan Mohan Malaviya, combined modern education with Indian traditional values, strengthening the intellectual foundation for political resistance.
Leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak used educational initiatives to cultivate a sense of national identity and to promote resistance against British colonial rule.
Integration of Folk Culture into the Nationalist Struggle:
Folk songs, stories, and symbols, which were vital parts of India’s rural traditions, became instrumental in mobilizing the masses for the nationalist cause.
Example: The bhajan Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram, popularized by Mahatma Gandhi, became a unifying anthem that resonated with people across regions and communities.
2. Political Resistance Fueling Cultural Revival
Religious Symbolism in Political Mobilization:
Political leaders effectively utilized cultural and religious symbolism to stir nationalist sentiment and unite people across India.
Example: Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s promotion of Ganesh Chaturthi as a public festival served not only to celebrate Indian culture but also to foster a sense of unity and pride among the masses.
Countering British Cultural Hegemony:
The nationalist movement sought to challenge the British narrative that portrayed Indians as “uncivilized” and inferior. Cultural narratives highlighting India’s rich heritage became essential in building pride in India’s past.
Example: Swami Vivekananda’s speech at the 1893 Chicago Parliament of Religions emphasized India’s spiritual depth, positioning Indian culture as intellectually and morally superior, thus empowering political resistance.
Conclusion
The Indian nationalist movement was a powerful fusion of cultural regeneration and political resistance. Cultural revival instilled a sense of pride and unity, which invigorated the political struggle against British rule. Conversely, the political resistance provided the necessary urgency and platform for cultural renewal, ensuring its broad reach. This synergy between culture and politics laid the foundation for India’s eventual independence.