17th may 2025 Current Affairs
PMAY-U Coffee Table Book Released in Kohima to Highlight Urban Housing Progress Syllabus:Schemes Context: The Government of Nagaland has officially unveiled a Coffee Table Book titled “Transforming Lives: A Glance of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) Mission in Nagaland”. This publication commemorates the progress and impact of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Urban (PMAY-U) scheme in the state, particularly in providing dignified and affordable housing to urban poor communities. Significance of the Launch Date & Venue: May 16, 2025 | Hotel Vivor, Kohima Released by: Shri Zhaleo Rio, Advisor for Municipal Affairs and Urban Development Chaired by: Shri Kekhrievor Kevichusa, Commissioner & Secretary, MAUD Special Features: Invocation by Rev. Dr. Kevichalie Metha Musical performance by TRUISM Vote of thanks delivered by Smt. Temjenrenla Kichu, Joint Director, Municipal Affairs Department About the Coffee Table Book Title: Transforming Lives: A Glance of PMAY (Urban) Mission in Nagaland Purpose: To visually document success stories, policy implementation, and community transformation under PMAY-U Content Highlights: Real-life narratives of beneficiaries Visual documentation of urban development Insights into implementation challenges and grassroots engagement Overview of PMAY-U (Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana – Urban) Launched: June 25, 2015 Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) Objective: Housing for All in urban areas by the year 2022 Key Components: In-Situ Slum Redevelopment (ISSR) Credit-Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS) Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP) Beneficiary-Led Construction (BLC) Impact of PMAY-U in Nagaland Thousands of urban households have benefitted from housing assistance Strengthened the construction sector and generated employment Enhanced socio-economic inclusion through property registration in women’s names Improved access to basic amenities, leading to better quality of life for urban poor With reference to the Coffee Table Book “Transforming Lives: A Glance of PMAY (Urban) Mission in Nagaland”, consider the following statements: The book was launched by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to commemorate 75 years of India’s independence. The book contains a visual record of PMAY-U implementation challenges and beneficiary narratives in Nagaland. The event was presided over by the Governor of Nagaland and included an address by the Prime Minister. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?A) 2 onlyB) 1 and 3 onlyC) 1 and 2 onlyD) 2 and 3 only Answer:A Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. The book documents the visual and narrative impact of PMAY-U in Nagaland, including challenges and success stories. Statement 1 is incorrect as the book was released under the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, not the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, and it was not linked to the 75th year of independence. Statement 3 is incorrect as the event was chaired by state officials—not by the Governor or Prime Minister. Justice Bela M. Trivedi Bids Farewell to Supreme Court After Trailblazing Career Syllabus:Polity Justice Bela M. Trivedi retired from the Supreme Court of India on May 16, 2025, after a distinguished tenure of three-and-a-half years. Her career stands out for a series of pioneering milestones, significant constitutional rulings, and a legal journey that spanned from trial courts to the apex judiciary. Justice Trivedi’s retirement marks the culmination of a historic legal journey, beginning in Gujarat’s trial courts in 1995 and culminating in transformative judgments on constitutional law, child protection, reservation policy, and economic regulation. She was the 11th woman judge in the history of the Supreme Court of India and one of the rare judges to be elevated from a trial court (appointed July 10, 1995, Ahmedabad) to the Supreme Court (August 31, 2021). She was also featured in the Limca Book of Records for being part of a father-daughter judge duo serving in the same court. Among her landmark judgments were the EWS Reservation Case (Nov 2022), where she was part of the 5-judge bench that upheld 10% reservation under the 103rd Constitutional Amendment; the Sub-classification within SCs case (Aug 2024), where she delivered a dissenting opinion against allowing states to sub-categorise Scheduled Castes; and the POCSO Act Interpretation (Nov 2021), where she overruled the controversial “skin-to-skin” verdict by emphasizing that intent and any physical contact qualify as sexual assault. In the IBC ruling, she held that a moratorium under IBC does not prevent states from attaching properties under depositor protection laws. In May 2025, she cleared the UP government’s temple corridor project for the Banke Bihari temple in Mathura. Professionally, she practiced law in the Gujarat High Court for a decade, held key administrative roles including Registrar Vigilance and Law Secretary in Gujarat, was elevated to the Gujarat High Court in 2011, transferred to the Rajasthan High Court the same year, and returned to the Gujarat High Court in 2016. She was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2021 during a historic induction of 9 judges, including 3 women. Justice Trivedi’s legal journey is emblematic of progress in gender inclusivity and judicial reform. Her judgments have significantly influenced protections for children, rights of marginalized communities, and constitutional law, leaving a lasting legacy in Indian jurisprudence. With reference to the judicial career of Justice Bela M. Trivedi, consider the following statements: She was elevated directly from a trial court to the Supreme Court without serving in any High Court. She dissented in a Supreme Court judgment allowing states to sub-categorize Scheduled Castes, arguing it violated the constitutional mandate of equality. She authored the majority opinion in the 2022 verdict upholding the 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) under the 103rd Constitutional Amendment. In a landmark ruling under the POCSO Act, she held that absence of physical skin-to-skin contact nullifies the charge of sexual assault. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? A) 2 onlyB) 1 and 4 onlyC) 2 and 3 onlyD) 1, 2 and 4 only Answer: A) 2 only Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect: Justice Trivedi served in multiple High Courts (Gujarat, Rajasthan) before being elevated to the Supreme Court. Statement 2 is correct: She gave a dissenting opinion in the case allowing sub-categorisation within SCs, citing concerns over equality. Statement 3 is