16th april 2025 Current Affairs
Shifting Cheetahs From Kuno Park to Gandhi Sagar Syllabus :GS 3/ Environment The Cheetah Project Steering Committee has approved the relocation of cheetahs from Kuno National Park to Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary in Madhya Pradesh, ~300 km away. Aim: To establish a metapopulation of 60–70 cheetahs across the Kuno-Gandhi Sagar landscape, covering parts of Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. Project Cheetah – Overview Launched in 2022 with 8 cheetahs from Namibia and 12 from South Africa Since then, 8 adult cheetahs and 5 cubs have died Implemented by the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) under MoEF&CC, in partnership with: Madhya Pradesh Forest Department Wildlife Institute of India (WII) Cheetah experts from Namibia & South Africa Did You Know? Cheetahs are the world’s fastest land animals (60–70 mph) Adapted with a slender build, long limbs, and semi-retractable claws Once widespread in Africa and Asia, now found in only 10% of their original range A critically endangered population exists in Iran Declared extinct in India in 1952 Cheetah Status at Kuno (2025): 26 cheetahs total 17 in the wild, 9 in enclosures Relocation group yet to be decided About Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary Located in eastern Madhya Pradesh, along the Chambal River, near Gandhi Sagar Dam Part of the Khathiar-Gir Dry Deciduous Forests eco-region Features mixed dry deciduous vegetation Houses the Chaturbhuj Nala rock shelters with prehistoric cave paintings With reference to cheetah conservation efforts in India, consider the following statements: The relocation of cheetahs from Kuno National Park to Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary is aimed at enhancing genetic diversity within a confined breeding population. Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary lies within the Central Indian Highlands and belongs to the Northern Tropical Moist Deciduous Forests eco-region. Project Cheetah is implemented solely by the National Tiger Conservation Authority without international collaboration. Cheetahs have been reintroduced into India despite being globally classified as extinct in the wild. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? A. 1 and 2 onlyB. 1 and 4 onlyC. 3 and 4 onlyD. None of the above Answer: D. None of the above Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because the relocation aims to establish a metapopulation across a landscape to ensure population stability and resilience, not merely to enhance genetic diversity within a confined group. Statement 2 is incorrect as Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary falls under the Khathiar-Gir Dry Deciduous Forests eco-region, not the Northern Tropical Moist Deciduous type. Statement 3 is incorrect because Project Cheetah is being implemented by the NTCA in collaboration with the Madhya Pradesh Forest Department, Wildlife Institute of India, and international experts from Namibia and South Africa. Statement 4 is incorrect as cheetahs are not globally extinct in the wild; they are present in parts of Africa and Iran. They were declared extinct in India in 1952, not globally. Type 5 Diabetes Syllabus:Health In a landmark development, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) officially recognised Type 5 Diabetes as a distinct medical condition during the World Diabetes Congress in Bangkok. This form of diabetes, largely overlooked until now, primarily affects malnourished individuals and poses a significant yet under acknowledged public health challenge. Key Features of Type 5 Diabetes Etiology: Type 5 Diabetes is a malnutrition-related form of diabetes, distinct from both Type 1 and Type 2. Demographics: It predominantly affects lean and malnourished adolescents and young adults, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with high prevalence in regions of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Global Burden: Estimated to affect 20–25 million people worldwide, it is considered more prevalent than tuberculosis and nearly as widespread as HIV/AIDS. Pathophysiology: The disease is characterised by a deep defect in insulin secretion, unlike Type 2 diabetes, which involves insulin resistance. Emerging research also suggests that insulin therapy may be harmful for Type 5 patients, indicating a critical need for tailored treatment strategies. Historical Context First described in 1955 in Jamaica as J-type diabetes, similar cases were subsequently reported during the 1960s across India, Pakistan, and sub-Saharan Africa. While the World Health Organization (WHO) recognised the condition in 1985, it later retracted this status in 1999 due to limited longitudinal research and diagnostic ambiguity. Recent Developments and Institutional Response Recognising the growing burden and diagnostic challenges of the disease, the IDF has constituted a working group to: Formulate diagnostic and therapeutic protocols within the next two years. Establish a global patient registry to support clinical research and data-sharing. Develop educational modules for healthcare professionals to improve diagnosis and disease management. This move is seen as a critical step toward addressing the systemic neglect of malnutrition-linked non-communicable diseases, particularly in resource-limited settings. Challenges Ahead The lack of formal recognition and classification until recently has contributed to significant under-diagnosis and mistreatment. The absence of standardised diagnostic criteria and widespread awareness has hampered clinical response and policy formulation. As global health systems increasingly address both communicable and non-communicable diseases in tandem, the recognition of Type 5 Diabetes may serve as a turning point in rethinking nutrition-linked metabolic disorders, especially in underserved populations. Consider the following statements regarding the recently recognised Type 5 Diabetes: It primarily affects overweight adults in high-income countries. Type 5 Diabetes is marked by a fundamental defect in insulin secretion rather than insulin resistance. The World Health Organization (WHO) has continuously recognised Type 5 Diabetes since 1985. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) plans to develop formal guidelines and establish a global registry for this condition. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? A) 1 and 3 onlyB) 2 and 4 onlyC) 2, 3, and 4 onlyD) 1, 2, and 4 only Answer: B) 2 and 4 only Explanation: Statement 1: Incorrect. Type 5 Diabetes does not affect overweight adults in high-income countries. It predominantly affects lean and malnourished teenagers and young adults, especially in low- and middle-income countries across Asia and Africa. Statement 2: Correct. Unlike Type 2 diabetes, which is primarily due to insulin resistance, Type 5 diabetes is marked by a deep defect in insulin secretion. Statement 3: