TOne Academy

3rd may 2025 Current Affairs

Home / Articles posted bykarthik

3rd may 2025 Current Affairs

NITI Aayog Releases Report on “Enhancing Competitiveness of MSMEs in India Syllabus:Reports   NITI Aayog, in collaboration with the Institute for Competitiveness (IFC), has released a comprehensive report titled “Enhancing MSMEs Competitiveness in India”. The report offers a roadmap to unlock the potential of India’s Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) through systemic reforms in financing, skilling, innovation, and market access.   Key Highlights: Credit Access: Formal credit access improved between 2020 and 2024 — from 14% to 20% for micro and small enterprises, and from 4% to 9% for medium enterprises. However, a significant credit gap of ₹80 lakh crore persists. The report calls for revamping the Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE) with better institutional collaboration. Skill & Innovation Deficit: A large section of MSME workers lack formal technical or vocational training, limiting productivity and scalability. Investment in R&D and innovation remains low, weakening global competitiveness. Technology Adoption Challenges: Barriers include unreliable power, weak internet connectivity, and high costs. Many MSMEs are unaware of or unable to access government schemes aimed at technological support. Cluster Analysis: Upgrading outdated technologies and strengthening branding and marketing capacities are key to improving competitiveness. Policy Gaps: While multiple national and state-level MSME support policies exist, low awareness and weak implementation dilute impact. The report recommends better monitoring, data integration, and stakeholder engagement.   Way Forward: The report emphasizes the need for state-level, cluster-based policies, enhanced digital marketing and logistics support, and improved market linkages, particularly in high-growth regions like eastern and northeastern India. Strengthening institutional frameworks and boosting awareness are crucial to driving inclusive and sustainable growth in the MSME sector. With reference to the recent report titled “Enhancing MSMEs Competitiveness in India”, released by NITI Aayog in collaboration with the Institute for Competitiveness (IFC), consider the following statements: The report identifies the textile and chemical sectors among the four primary MSME sectors analyzed for competitiveness. The Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE) currently covers more than 80% of the formal credit demand of the MSME sector. The report finds that the lack of awareness about state-level schemes is a major constraint in technology adoption by MSMEs. The National Skill Qualification Framework (NSQF) was identified as a major success factor for MSME skilling programs across all sectors. Which of the above statements is/are correct? A. 1 and 3 onlyB. 2 and 4 onlyC. 1, 3, and 4 onlyD. 1, 2, and 4 only Answer: A. 1 and 3 only Explanation: Statement 1: Correct. The report focuses on four sectors: textiles and apparel, chemical products, automotive, and food processing. Statement 2: Incorrect. The CGTMSE, while expanded, still leaves a large credit gap. Only about 19% of credit demand was met formally as of FY21. Statement 3: Correct. The report highlights that lack of awareness and accessibility to state government schemes is a barrier to technology adoption. Statement 4: Incorrect. NSQF is not cited in the report as a major driver; instead, the report flags gaps in vocational and technical training. India and Denmark signs renewed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) today Syllabus:IR   India and Denmark have deepened their collaboration in the energy sector by signing a renewed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at accelerating the clean energy transition and supporting India’s target of achieving net-zero emissions by 2070. The MoU was signed by Shri Pankaj Agarwal, Secretary, Ministry of Power, and E. Mr. Rasmus Abildgaard Kristensen, Ambassador of Denmark to India, in the presence of Shri Manohar Lal, Minister of Power and Housing & Urban Affairs. This renewed agreement builds on five years of successful cooperation under the original MoU signed on June 5, 2020, which was set to expire in June 2025. The updated agreement expands the scope of partnership to include advanced energy domains such as:   Power system modeling Integration of variable renewable energy Cross-border electricity trading   Development of electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure It also strengthens institutional cooperation through expert exchanges, joint training programs, and study tours. Minister Manohar Lal emphasized that this renewed cooperation reaffirms the shared vision of India and Denmark to promote sustainable development and green energy solutions through innovation and technological collaboration. Which of the following statements regarding the India–Denmark energy cooperation MoU (2025) is/are correct? It supports India’s commitment to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. The renewed MoU expands cooperation to include power system modeling and EV infrastructure. The original MoU was signed in 2020 and was valid for a period of five years. Select the correct answer using the code below: 1 and 2 only 2 and 3 only 1 and 3 only 1, 2 and 3 Answer: B Explanation: India’s net-zero target is by 2070, not 2050. The rest are correct. short explanation. India’s net-zero emissions target is set for 2070, not 2050. However, the MoU does include cooperation on power system modeling and EV infrastructure, and the original agreement was signed in 2020 for five years, making statements 2 and 3 correct. GAME and NITI Aayog join hands to catalyse healthy entrepreneurship ecosystems across India Syllabus:Environment NITI Aayog and the Global Alliance for Mass Entrepreneurship (GAME) have joined forces in a strategic partnership aimed at fostering dynamic entrepreneurship ecosystems across multiple Indian states. The initiative will begin with pilot projects in Nagpur, Visakhapatnam, and parts of Uttar Pradesh, focusing on place-based interventions tailored to the unique needs of each region. The collaboration brings together key local stakeholders — including government agencies, corporates, educational institutions, financial entities, experienced entrepreneurs, and community-based organisations — to support local entrepreneurs through targeted, community-driven approaches. The objective is to create self-sustaining ecosystems that promote entrepreneurship as a vehicle for economic growth and job creation. Speaking on the partnership, Ishtiyaque Ahmed, Programme Director for Industry/MSME at NITI Aayog, emphasized the need for bottom-up engagement, working closely with grassroots entrepreneurs to understand and address their specific challenges. GAME’s proven methodologies will guide the pilot interventions, covering areas such as access to finance, capacity building, policy support, and community

Monthly Current Affairs April 2025

Polity & Governance International Relations Economy Science and Technology & Defence Environment Indices and Reports Geography Awards Security History & Art and Culture Telangana Becomes First State to Implement SC Sub-Categorisation Syllabus:Polity On April 14, 2025—coinciding with Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s birth anniversary—the Government of Telangana issued a historic Government Order (GO) to implement the Telangana Scheduled Castes (Rationalization of Reservations) Act, 2025, making it the first state in India to operationalize sub-categorisation among Scheduled Castes (SCs). This move aims to equitably redistribute the existing 15% SC reservation by dividing 59 SC sub-castes into three groups based on relative backwardness, ensuring targeted affirmative action.   Key Legislative and Legal Timeline Act Passed by Assembly: March 18, 2025 Governor’s Assent: April 8, 2025 GO Issued: April 14, 2025 (Ambedkar Jayanti) SC Judgment Enabling Sub-Categorisation: August 1, 2024 Commission Appointed: October 2024 Commission Head: Justice Shamim Akhtar (Retd.)   Basis for Grouping Population size Literacy and education access Employment rates Financial assistance received Political participation Representations: Over 8,600 received by the commission   Government Justifications Health Minister Damodar Raja Narasimha: “Not a final solution, but a corrective tool for equitable upliftment. Education, skill training, and financial aid are key.” Civil Supplies Minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy: “No dilution of existing benefits. No creamy layer within SCs. Reservation may rise post-2026 Census (SC population: 17.5%).” Judicial and Commission Backing SC Judgment (Aug 2024): Legally permitted sub-categorisation within SCs Justice Shamim Akhtar Commission: Conducted wide consultations and data-driven analysis   Historical Committees Referenced: Lokur Committee (1965) Justice Ramachandra Raju Commission (1996) Usha Mehra Commission (2007)   Political and Social Reactions CPI MLA K. Sambasiva Reddy: Criticized the Rella community’s classification into Group 3 AIMIM MLA Majid Hussain: Suggested increasing SC reservation to 18% and creating 4 sub-categories Govt Stand: 3-group system strikes balance—2 groups would underrepresent the most backward; 4 would complicate policy Consider the following statements about the Supreme Court judgment dated August 1, 2024, regarding SC sub-categorisation: It declared sub-categorisation within SCs unconstitutional. It laid the legal foundation for Telangana’s move to classify SCs into three groups. It emphasized that sub-categorisation cannot be implemented without Parliament’s approval. Which of the statements is/are correct? A. 1 onlyB. 2 onlyC. 1 and 3 onlyD. 2 and 3 only Answer: BExplanation: The SC upheld the validity of sub-categorisation within SCs by states under Article 15(4) and 16(4), enabling Telangana’s Act. The Supreme Court, in its August 1, 2024 judgment, did not declare sub-categorisation unconstitutional. In fact, it upheld the validity of sub-categorisation of Scheduled Castes by individual states under Articles 15(4) and 16(4), provided it is done rationally and based on empirical data. Concerns Raised over the Amendment into the RTI Act Syllabus: GS2/Governance   New Data Protection Rules and Impact on the RTI Act Recent Development The Union Minister for Information and Technology clarified that personal information required to be disclosed under existing laws will continue to be available under the RTI Act even after the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules are implemented.   Key Changes to the RTI Act Amendment Trigger: The RTI Act will be amended following the notification of DPDP rules. Section 8(1)(j) Update: Now includes a blanket restriction on disclosing personal information, even if public interest is involved. Government’s Stand: Disclosure is still allowed where it is legally mandated. The amendment is justified in light of the 2017 Supreme Court ruling that affirmed the right to privacy as a part of Article 21.   Concerns Raised Reduced Transparency: May hinder access to critical information needed for social audits and exposing corruption or fund misuse. Civil Society View: The amendment undermines the balance between privacy and transparency established in the original Act. Pending Status: The amendment is not yet in effect; civil society groups are urging the government to revise the draft DPDP rules.   Related Reforms and Rules RTI Amendment Act, 2019 Tenure: Reduced tenure of CICs and ICs to 3 years (from 5). Service Conditions: Salaries and terms now set by the Central Government, no longer linked to Election Commissioners. RTI Rules, 2022 Encourages online filing of RTI applications. Streamlined appeal and complaint   RTI Act, 2005 – Overview Purpose To promote transparency and hold public authorities accountable by giving citizens the right to access information.     Scope Covers government bodies and any organization substantially funded by the government.   Key Features 30-day response period (extendable to 45 days in some cases). Penalties for non-compliance or false information. Exemptions include matters affecting national security, confidentiality, or ongoing investigations.   Significance of RTI Empowers citizens and encourages democratic participation. Critical in exposing corruption, e.g., in NREGS and PDS. Facilitates social audits by NGOs and activists. Improves transparency in government contracts and projects.   Challenges Burden on authorities due to high volume of requests. Misuse by individuals for personal vendettas. Delays in processing applications. Inadequate training and infrastructure in public offices. Ambiguous exemptions sometimes used to deny legitimate information.   Way Forward RTI remains a cornerstone for good governance and democratic accountability. The upcoming DPDP Rules must ensure that transparency is not compromised. A careful balance is needed between the right to privacy and the citizen’s right to information. Civil society’s input should be incorporated before finalizing the rules to safeguard the RTI Act’s original intent. Consider the following statements regarding the RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019: It fixed the tenure of CIC and ICs at both central and state levels to three years. Salaries of CICs and ICs are now equated with the Chief Election Commissioner. The amendment grants the Central Government power to determine service conditions of Information Commissioners. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? A. 1 and 2 onlyB. 2 and 3 onlyC. 1 and 3 onlyD. 1, 2 and 3 Answer:CExplanation: Statement 2 is incorrect — the amendment removed equivalence with Election Commissioners. Now, the Centre decides their salary and terms. Statement 1 and 3 are correct. UP’s Zero Poverty Scheme to be Named After Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Syllabus:   Scheme   On the occasion

Weekly Current Affairs 1st May -8th May 2025

Society History Governance Science and Technology Environment Polity Economy Intellectual Property Rights Geography Reports Disproportionate Burden on Women in Risk Society Syllabus: GS1/ Society   What is a Risk Society? Coined by German sociologist Ulrich Beck in his 1986 book Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Refers to a shift from industrial society to one dominated by man-made risks—like climate change, pandemics, and technological hazards—arising from modern development. Unlike natural disasters, these risks are global, complex, and often invisible, affecting societies unequally.       Why Women Are Disproportionately Affected Environmental & Health Risks: Water collection exposes women to contaminated sources, increasing the risk of disease. Solid fuels for cooking cause indoor air pollution, leading to chronic respiratory issues. Gender norms (e.g., eating last or less) worsen women’s nutritional and health outcomes. NFHS-5 (2019–21): 57% of Indian women suffer from anaemia vs. 25% of men. Economic Vulnerability: Concentration in informal work with low job security and savings. Limited land ownership and asset access hinder disaster recovery. Lower credit access increases dependency and reduces resilience. Unpaid care work adds emotional and physical strain. Political & Institutional Exclusion: Women’s voices are often missing in policy-making, especially in disaster preparedness and climate governance. Results in gender-blind policies and missed use of women’s community knowledge.   Way Forward Gender Mainstreaming: Integrate women’s needs into all risk reduction, climate, and pandemic strategies. Economic Empowerment: Ensure land rights, financial access, and social protection schemes prioritise women. Care Infrastructure: Support unpaid care work via crèches, health insurance, and community kitchens. Inclusive Governance: Institutionalise women’s participation in disaster management and local planning bodies. Consider the following statements regarding the concept of a “Risk Society” and its gendered impacts: The term “Risk Society” was coined by Ulrich Beck in 1986 and refers to a society increasingly shaped by global, man-made risks such as climate change, pandemics, and technological hazards. Women are disproportionately affected by environmental and health risks, such as water collection from contaminated sources and indoor air pollution from solid fuels. Women’s economic vulnerability is exacerbated by higher participation in the formal labor sector, where job security and savings are guaranteed. Political and institutional exclusion of women often leads to gender-neutral policies, ignoring their unique needs in disaster preparedness and climate governance. Which of the above statements is/are correct? A. 1 and 2 onlyB. 2 and 4 onlyC. 1, 2, and 4 onlyD. 1, 2, 3, and 4 Answer: C. 1, 2, and 4 only Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Ulrich Beck’s “Risk Society” indeed describes the shift towards a society dominated by human-made, global risks such as climate change, pandemics, and technological hazards. Statement 2 is correct. Women are disproportionately affected by environmental and health risks, such as exposure to contaminated water and indoor air pollution, which are exacerbated by gendered roles (e.g., water collection and cooking). Statement 3 is incorrect. Women are more likely to be concentrated in the informal labor sector, where job security and savings are often lacking, not in the formal sector as the statement suggests. Statement 4 is correct. Women’s exclusion from decision-making results in gender-blind policies, ignoring their specific needs in the context of disaster preparedness and climate governance. Years of End of the Vietnam War Syllabus: GS1/World History Background Vietnam had been a French colony since the mid-19th century, part of French Indochina along with Laos and Cambodia. During World War II, Japan occupied Vietnam, allowing the French to retain some control. After Japan’s defeat in 1945, Ho Chi Minh, leader of the Viet Minh (League for the Independence of Vietnam), declared Vietnam’s independence. However, the French attempted to reassert control, leading to the First Indochina War.     The Vietnam War: The Vietnam War, also known as the Second Indochina War, was a prolonged conflict from 1955 to 1975 between North Vietnam (Communist) and South Vietnam (anti-Communist), with significant U.S. involvement on the side of the South. North Vietnam: Led by Ho Chi Minh and the Communist Party, it was supported by the Soviet Union, China, and other communist nations. South Vietnam: Initially led by Ngo Dinh Diem, with various leaders taking charge after multiple coups. It received support from the United States, South Korea, Australia, Thailand, and others.   Causes of the War Division of Vietnam: Following the First Indochina War, the 1954 Geneva Accords temporarily divided Vietnam at the 17th parallel, establishing North and South Vietnam. Cold War Tensions: The U.S. feared the spread of communism in Asia, adhering to the “Domino Theory,” which suggested that if one country fell to communism, neighboring countries might follow. Internal Conflict: The Viet Cong insurgency in South Vietnam, aligned with the Communist North, sought to reunify the country under communist rule.   Key Phases Advisory Phase (1955–1963): The U.S. provided military advisors and aid to the South Vietnamese government. The unpopular regime of Ngo Dinh Diem was overthrown in a U.S.-backed coup in 1963.   Escalation (1964–1969): The Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964) allegedly saw attacks on U.S. ships, leading to increased U.S. involvement. S. troop levels peaked at over 500,000 by 1969, with significant battles like the Tet Offensive (1968), Battle of Hue, and Khe Sanh. The use of napalm, Agent Orange, and carpet bombing provoked widespread international outrage. Withdrawal (1969–1973): Under President Richard Nixon, the U.S. pursued “Vietnamization,” training South Vietnamese forces to take over the war. U.S. forces began withdrawing, and the Paris Peace Accords were signed in 1973.   Final Collapse (1973–1975): Despite the U.S. withdrawal, fighting continued, and on April 30, 1975, North Vietnamese forces captured Saigon, marking the end of the war. Vietnam was reunified under communist control, becoming the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.   Agent Orange: Agent Orange, a potent herbicide, was used by the U.S. military during the Vietnam War as part of Operation Ranch Hand (1961–1971). This controversial chemical became one of the war’s most infamous symbols due to its severe health and environmental impacts.   Manufacturing: The production of 2,4,5-T, a component of Agent Orange, led to the creation

Weekly Current Affairs 28th April- 30th April 2025

Governance International Relations Economy Science & Technology & Defence Environment Geography Urban Planning Awards Women & Society Reports Arts & Culture Bihar’s Mukhya Mantri Vidyut Upbhokta Sahayta Yojana Syllabus GS2/Governance The Bihar Cabinet, chaired by the Chief Minister, has approved a subsidy of ₹15,995 crore under the Mukhya Mantri Vidyut Upbhokta Sahayta Yojana for the financial year 2025-26. This allocation is ₹652 crore more than the subsidy granted in the previous year.   Mukhya Mantri Vidyut Upbhokta Sahayta Yojana: Introduced in Bihar, this scheme aims to provide significant electricity subsidies to ease the financial burden on consumers and promote fair access to power throughout the state.   The subsidy is designed to reduce the per-unit cost of electricity for consumers, and will be directly provided to the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) through the Reserve Bank of India.   The subsidy will be reflected in consumers’ monthly energy bills, covering the period from April 2025 to March 2026. This move is intended to offset the impact of rising electricity tariff rates.   Did You Know? The Government of India launched the Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana (SAUBHAGYA) in October 2017, with the goal of achieving universal household electrification.   This initiative provides electricity connections to all willing un-electrified households in rural areas and to poor households in urban areas across the country.   Consider the following statements regarding the Mukhya Mantri Vidyut Upbhokta Sahayta Yojana: The scheme provides subsidies directly to consumers through the Reserve Bank of India to reduce their electricity bills. The subsidy aims to alleviate the financial burden on consumers by lowering per-unit electricity costs and is allocated for the period from April 2025 to March 2026. The subsidy under the scheme is specifically aimed at reducing the electricity tariffs for commercial consumers in Bihar. The Bihar Government has allocated ₹15,995 crore for the scheme in 2025-26, which is an increase of ₹652 crore from the previous year’s budget. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1, 2, and 4 only(b) 2, 3, and 4 only(c) 1, 3, and 4 only(d) 1, 2, 3, and 4 Answer: (a) 1, 2, and 4 onlyExplanation: Statement 1: Correct – The subsidy is provided through the Reserve Bank of India directly to the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), which helps reduce the per-unit cost for consumers. Statement 2: Correct – The subsidy will indeed be for the period from April 2025 to March 2026, aimed at reducing the per-unit electricity costs. Statement 3: Incorrect – The scheme primarily targets domestic consumers, not commercial consumers. Statement 4: Correct – The Bihar government has allocated ₹15,995 crore, which is an increase of ₹652 crore over the previous year’s allocation. Bandung Conference Syllabus: GS2/ International Relations This year marks 70 years since the historic Bandung Conference, a landmark moment in the rise of the Global South as a political force.   About the Bandung Conference (1955) Held in Bandung, Indonesia, the conference brought together 29 newly independent Asian and African nations. It aimed to confront the challenges of decolonization, assert sovereignty, and offer an alternative voice in a world dominated by Cold War superpowers. The event laid the groundwork for the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and promoted Afro-Asian solidarity through economic and cultural cooperation. It opposed colonialism, imperialism, and neocolonialism in all forms. Bandung’s Ten Principles (Dasasila Bandung) Respect for human rights and the UN Charter Sovereignty and territorial integrity of all nations Equality of all races and nations Non-interference in internal affairs Right to self-defense per the UN Charter No use of collective defense to serve big power interests No aggression or use of force Peaceful settlement of disputes Promotion of mutual interests and cooperation Respect for justice and international obligations Legacy and Relevance The Bandung Conference is remembered as a powerful assertion of self-determination and dignity for post-colonial nations.Its vision continues to inspire efforts toward a just, multipolar world order in an era of global realignments. What is the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)? Definition: A group of developing countries that remained independent of Cold War power blocs. Origins: Traces back to Bandung (1955); formally established in 1961 in Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Founding Leaders: Jawaharlal Nehru (India) Gamal Abdel Nasser (Egypt) Josip Tito (Yugoslavia) Sukarno (Indonesia) Kwame Nkrumah (Ghana) Structure: No permanent secretariat or binding charter Second-largest international grouping after the United Nations Membership: 120 member countries: 53 from Africa 39 from Asia 26 from Latin America & the Caribbean 2 from Europe Includes Palestine and 17 observer states With reference to the Bandung Principles, which of the following statements is/are correct? They allowed for collective defense only under UN authorization. They prohibited any nation from using its military strength to exert influence on smaller nations. They emphasized cultural cooperation over economic cooperation among Afro-Asian countries. Select the correct answer using the code below:(a) 1 and 2 only(b) 2 and 3 only(c) 1 and 3 only(d) 1, 2 and 3 Answer: (a)     Explanation: Statement 1 is correct: Bandung principles align with the UN Charter, allowing defense only in conformity with it. Statement 2 is correct: One of the ten principles specifically opposes the use of power to dominate smaller nations. Statement 3 is incorrect: The conference emphasized both economic and cultural cooperation, not prioritizing one over the other. World Bank: India’s Extreme Poverty Drops to 2.3% Syllabus :GS 3/Economy  According to the World Bank’s Poverty and Equity Briefs (PEBs), India has made remarkable strides in reducing extreme poverty, with the proportion of people living in extreme poverty dropping from 16% in 2011–12 to just 2.3% in 2022–23. This substantial reduction represents a major milestone in the country’s ongoing efforts to combat poverty. About the Poverty and Equity Briefs (PEBs) The Poverty and Equity Briefs (PEBs) are biannual reports published by the World Bank. These reports provide a snapshot of trends in poverty, inequality, and shared prosperity across over 100 developing countries. The PEBs are released during the Spring and Annual Meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund