In 1600, the East India Company, which was granted an exclusive trading charter by Queen Elizabeth I, brought the British to India as traders. When the Company began to exercise territorial control in 1765, it moved away from its trade position and obtained the “diwani”—the rights to revenue and civil justice—in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The British Crown assumed direct control of India’s government in 1858 after the Sepoy Mutiny, and this arrangement lasted until August 15, 1947, when India gained independence.
Indian Independence necessitated the drafting of a constitution. In order to address this need, a Constituent Assembly was formed in 1946, and on January 26, 1950, the Constitution was adopted.
Since several significant events during this time created the legal framework for the governance and administration of British India, many elements of the Indian Constitution and political system have their roots in British rule. These noteworthy occurrences are discussed in chronological order under two main headings:
1. The Company Rule (1773-1858)
2. The Crown Rule (1858–1947)
Regulating Act of 1773
Since it was the first move the British Government took to regulate and supervise the East India Company’s operations in India, the Regulating Act of 1773 was noteworthy for its constitutional implications.
It established the foundation for central administration in India and was the first legislation to recognize the Company’s political and administrative responsibilities.
Key features of the Act included:
1. The designation of the Governor of Bengal as the “Governor-General of Bengal,” along with the creation of a four-member Executive Council to support him. Lord Warren Hastings was the first Governor-General to be appointed under this legislation.
2. Unlike earlier, when the three presidencies were independent of one another, it placed the governors of Bombay and Madras under the governor-general of Bengal.
3. It provided for the creation of a Supreme Court at Calcutta (1774) consisting of a chief justice and three other judges.
4. It barred the Company’s servants from receiving presents or bribes from the “natives” or participating in any kind of private trade.
5. By compelling the Court of Directors, the Company’s governing body, to report on its revenue, civil, and military activities in India, it increased the British Government’s authority over the Company.
Amending Act of 1781
To address the shortcomings of the Regulating Act of 1773, the British Parliament enacted the Amending Act of 1781, also known as the Act of Settlement.
The main features of this Act included:
The 1784 Pitt’s India Act
The Pitt’s India Act2 of 1784 was the following significant law. This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
Therefore, the legislation was noteworthy for two reasons: first, the Company’s Indian lands were referred to as “British possessions in India” for the first time; and second, the British Government was granted complete authority over the management of the company’s operations in India.
The 1786 Act
Lord Cornwallis was named Governor-General of Bengal in 1786. In order to accept that position, he made two demands:
. He ought to have the authority to overrule his council’s judgment in certain circumstances.
. In addition, he would serve as Commander-in-Chief.
As a result, both provisions were made by the Act of 1786.
The 1793 Charter Act
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
1. It increased the supreme authority granted to Lord Cornwallis, to all next governors general and governors of presidency, over his council.
2. It granted the Governor-General additional authority and command over the administrations of the Bombay and Madras sub-presidencies.
3. It gave the company an additional twenty years of trade exclusivity in India.
4. It stated that unless specifically designated, the Commander-in-Chief was not to serve on the Governor-General’s council.
5. It stipulated that the Board of Control members and their employees would now be compensated using Indian income.
The 1813 Charter Act
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
1. It ended the company’s trade monopoly in India, which means All British merchants were allowed to deal with India. Nonetheless, it maintained the company’s monopoly on tea and trade with China.
2. It affirmed the British Crown’s authority over the Company’s Indian holdings.
3. It made it possible for Christian missionaries to travel to India in order to educate the populace.
4. It made it possible for the people who lived in the British colonies in India to receive an education in the West.
5. It gave Indian local governments the authority to tax citizens. They might also impose penalties on those who fail to pay taxes.
Charter Act of 1833
In British India, this Act was the last step toward centralization.
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
1.It gave the governor general of Bengal complete civil and military authority and made him the governor general of India. As a result, the legislation established the Government of India for the first time, with jurisdiction over all of the British-owned territory in India. India’s first governor general was Lord William Bentick.
2. It took away the legislative authority of the governors of Madras and Bombay. For all of British India, the Governor-General of India was granted sole legislative authority. The laws created under this act were referred to as Acts, whereas the laws issued under the earlier acts were known as Regulations.
3.It turned the East India Company into a purely administrative organization and put an end to its commercial operations. According to this clause, the Company owned its holdings in India “in trust for His Majesty, His heirs and successors.”
4. The Charter Act of 1833 declared that Indians should not be prohibited from holding any position, office, or job within the Company and aimed to establish an open competitive system for the selection of civil servants. But once the Court of Directors objected, this clause was removed.
Charter Act of 1853
The British Parliament passed a number of Charter Acts between 1793 and 1853, this being the final one. It was an important turning point in the constitution.
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
1. It separated the Governor-General’s Council’s executive and legislative branches for the first time. It allowed for the council to have six more members, known as legislative councillors. Stated differently, it created a distinct legislative body for the Governor-General, which became known as the Indian (Central) Legislative body. Using the same processes as the British Parliament, this council’s legislative branch operated as a miniature parliament. As a result, legislation was for the first time regarded as a unique government role that called for unique tools and procedures.
2. It instituted a system of open competition for civil servant recruitment and selection. Thus, the Indians were likewise granted access to the covenanted civil service3. Consequently, in 1854, the Committee on the Indian Civil Service, sometimes known as the Macaulay Committee, was established.
3. It gave the Company more authority and permitted it to hold onto Indian lands held in trust for the British Crown.
However, in contrast to the earlier Charters, it did not set a certain time frame. This was a blatant sign that the Parliament could end the Company’s reign whenever it pleased.
4. It brought local representation to the Indian (Central) Legislative Council for the first time. Four out of the Governor General’s Council’s six new lawmakers were appointed by the local (provincial)governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal and Agra.
The Crown Rule (1858-1947)
Government of India Act 1858
Following the Revolt of 1857, commonly referred to as the First War of Independence or the “sepoy mutiny,” this important Act was passed. The legislation referred to as the Good Government Act of
India, disbanded the East India Company, and gave the British Crown control over the country’s lands, government, and income.
This Act’s characteristics were as follows:
The Act of 1858 primarily focused on enhancing the administrative structure that oversaw the Indian Government from England. It did not bring about significant changes to the existing system of government in India.
Indian Councils Act of 1861
Following the significant revolt of 1857, the British Government recognized the need to enlist the cooperation of Indians in the administration of their country. To move towards this goal of inclusion, three acts were enacted by the British Parliament in 1861, 1892, and 1909. The Indian Councils Act of 1861 serves as a crucial milestone in the constitutional and political history of India.
Key features of the Indian Councils Act of 1861 include:
These features reflect the significant steps taken towards inclusivity and governance reform in colonial India.
Indian Councils Act of 1892
The Indian Councils Act of 1892 introduced several important features aimed at enhancing the legislative framework in India. The key provisions of this Act are as follows:
– The Viceroy could nominate some non-official members to the Central Legislative Council based on recommendations from the provincial legislative councils and the Bengal Chamber of Commerce.
– Governors could nominate members to the provincial legislative councils based on recommendations from various local bodies, including district boards, municipalities, universities, trade associations, zamindars, and chambers of commerce.
While the Act included a limited provision for using elections to fill some non-official seats in both the Central and provincial legislative councils, it did not explicitly use the term “election.” Instead, the process was characterized as nominations made on the recommendation of specific bodies.
These provisions represented a gradual move towards greater Indian participation in governance while still maintaining British control over the legislative process.
Indian Councils Act of 1909
The Indian Councils Act of 1909, commonly referred to as the Morley-Minto Reforms (named after then Secretary of State for India, Lord Morley, and then Viceroy of India, Lord Minto), introduced several crucial features:
Government of India Act of 1919
On August 20, 1917, the British Government announced its aim to gradually introduce responsible government in India. This led to the enactment of the Government of India Act of 1919, which came into effect in 1921 and is also known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (named after Montagu, the Secretary of State for India, and Lord Chelmsford, the Viceroy of India).
Key features of this Act include:
The Act reduced central control over the provinces by delineating and separating central and provincial subjects. Both central and provincial legislatures were authorized to legislate on their respective lists of subjects. However, the overall structure of government remained centralized and unitary in nature.
These Acts represented significant steps in the evolution of constitutional development and governance in India, marking a shift toward greater Indian participation in the political process.
The Act further categorized provincial subjects into two types—transferred and reserved. Transferred subjects were to be managed by the Governor with the assistance of Ministers who were accountable to the legislative council. In contrast, reserved subjects were to be administered solely by the Governor and his executive council, without any accountability to the legislative council. This dual governance structure was termed ‘dyarchy,’ originating from the Greek word “dyarchy,” meaning double rule. However, this system proved largely ineffective.
For the first time, the Act introduced bicameralism and direct elections in India. The Indian legislative council was replaced by a bicameral legislature, comprising an Upper House (Council of State) and a Lower House (Legislative Assembly). Most members of both Houses were elected directly by the electorate.
The Act stipulated that three of the six members of the Viceroy’s executive council (excluding the Commander-in-Chief) would be Indians.
The principle of communal representation was expanded under the Act, providing for separate electorates for Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans.
The Act granted voting rights to a limited segment of the population based on criteria such as property ownership, tax payments, or educational qualifications.
A new office, the High Commissioner for India, was created in London, taking over some functions previously performed by the Secretary of State for India.
The Act mandated the establishment of a public service commission, leading to the creation of the Central Public Service Commission in 1926 for the recruitment of civil servants.
For the first time, provincial budgets were separated from the central budget, allowing provincial legislatures to enact their own budgets.
The Act provided for the establishment of a statutory commission to review its functioning and report on the effectiveness of the Act after ten years of its implementation.
These features marked significant changes in the governance structure in India, laying the groundwork for increased Indian participation in the political process and introducing reforms aimed at creating a more representative system.Top of Form
Simon Commission
In November 1927, two years ahead of the scheduled date, the British Government announced the establishment of a seven-member statutory commission chaired by Sir John Simon. The purpose of the commission was to assess the situation in India under its new Constitution. Notably, all members of the commission were British, which led to a boycott from all Indian political parties. The commission submitted its report in 1930, which recommended several changes, including:
– The abolition of dyarchy.
– The extension of responsible government in the provinces.
– The establishment of a federation encompassing both British India and the princely states.
– The continuation of communal electorates.
To discuss and evaluate the commission’s proposals, the British Government organized three round table conferences, bringing together representatives from the British Government, British India, and Indian princely states. Following these discussions, a “White Paper on Constitutional Reforms” was prepared and submitted to the Joint Select Committee of the British Parliament. The recommendations put forth by this committee were subsequently incorporated, with some amendments, into the Government of India Act of 1935.
Communal Award
In August 1932, Ramsay MacDonald, the British Prime Minister, introduced a plan for the representation of minorities known as the Communal Award. This award not only maintained separate electorates for Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans but also extended this provision to the depressed classes (Scheduled Castes). Mahatma Gandhi was deeply disheartened by this expansion of communal representation to the depressed classes and undertook a fast unto death in Yerawada Jail (Pune) to advocate for a modification of the award.
Ultimately, an agreement was reached between the leaders of the Congress and the representatives of the depressed classes, known as the Poona Pact. This agreement preserved the Hindu joint electorate and allocated reserved seats for the depressed classes.
Government of India Act of 1935
The Government of India Act of 1935 is regarded as a significant milestone towards establishing a more responsible government in India. It was an extensive and detailed document comprising 321 sections and 10 schedules, outlining various aspects of governance and institutional structure in India.
The Government of India Act of 1935 included several significant features:
The Act proposed an All-India Federation comprising provinces and princely states as units. Powers were divided between the Centre and the units through three lists: the Federal List (containing 59 items for the Centre), the Provincial List (54 items for the provinces), and the Concurrent List (36 items for both). Residuary powers were assigned to the Viceroy. However, the federation was never realized as the princely states chose not to participate.
The Act abolished dyarchy and introduced ‘provincial autonomy.’ Provinces were empowered to act as autonomous administrative units within defined areas. Additionally, responsible government was instituted in provinces, which required the Governor to act upon the advice of ministers accountable to the provincial legislature. This arrangement was operational from 1937 until its discontinuation in 1939.
The Act proposed the reintroduction of dyarchy at the Centre, dividing federal subjects into reserved subjects and transferred subjects. However, this provision did not come into effect.
Bicameral legislatures were established in six of the eleven provinces, specifically Bengal, Bombay, Madras, Bihar, Assam, and the United Provinces. These legislatures comprised a legislative council (upper house) and a legislative assembly (lower house), though significant restrictions were placed on their functions.
The Act expanded the principle of communal representation by providing separate electorates for the depressed classes (Scheduled Castes), women, and labourers.
The Council of India, established by the Government of India Act of 1858, was abolished, and the Secretary of State for India was supported by a team of advisors.
The Act broadened the voting rights, extending them to roughly 10 percent of the total population.
The Act provided for the creation of the Reserve Bank of India to manage the currency and credit of the nation.
It established a Federal Public Service Commission, as well as Provincial Public Service Commissions and a Joint Public Service Commission for two or more provinces.
The Act provided for the creation of a Federal Court, which was established in 1937.
Indian Independence Act of 1947
On February 20, 1947, British Prime Minister Clement Attlee announced that British rule in India would cease by June 30, 1948, after which power would be transferred to responsible Indian leaders. This announcement was met with heightened agitation from the Muslim League, which demanded the partition of the country. On June 3, 1947, the British Government clarified that any Constitution drafted by the Constituent Assembly (formed in 1946) would not be applicable in areas unwilling to accept it. On the same day, Lord Mountbatten, the Viceroy of India, proposed the partition plan, known as the Mountbatten Plan, which was accepted by both the Congress and the Muslim League. The plan was promptly enacted through the Indian Independence Act of 1947.
Key features of this Act included:
The Act officially ended British rule in India, declaring India an independent and sovereign state as of August 15, 1947.
It provided for the partition of India and the creation of two independent dominions—India and Pakistan—with the right to secede from the British Commonwealth.
The position of Viceroy was abolished and replaced by a Governor-General for each dominion, who would be appointed by the British King upon the advice of the dominion cabinet. The British Government would have no responsibility regarding the governance of India or Pakistan.
The Act empowered the Constituent Assemblies of both dominions to draft and adopt their respective constitutions and to repeal any acts of the British Parliament, including the Independence Act itself.
These provisions marked a pivotal moment in Indian history, culminating in the establishment of independent governance in India and Pakistan.
The Act empowered the Constituent Assemblies of both dominions to legislate for their respective territories until new constitutions were developed and implemented. No Act of the British Parliament passed after August 15, 1947, would apply to either of the new dominions unless specifically extended by law from the legislature of that dominion.
The Act abolished the office of the Secretary of State for India, transferring his responsibilities to the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Affairs.
The Act declared the lapse of British paramountcy over the Indian princely states and ended treaty relations with tribal areas effective from August 15, 1947.
The Act granted Indian princely states the freedom to either join the Dominion of India or the Dominion of Pakistan, or choose to remain independent.
It provided for the continuation of governance in each of the dominions and provinces under the Government of India Act of 1935 until new constitutions were framed. The dominions were permitted to make modifications to the Act as necessary.
The Act removed the British Monarch’s right to veto bills or request the reservation of certain bills for royal approval. This power was retained for the Governor-General, who was authorized to assent to any bill in the name of His Majesty.
The Act designated the Governor-General of India and provincial governors as constitutional (nominal) heads of their respective states, requiring them to act based on the advice of the respective councils of ministers in all matters.
The Act eliminated the title “Emperor of India” from the royal titles held by the King of England.
The appointment of civil servants and the reservation of posts by the Secretary of State for India were discontinued. However, members of the civil services who were appointed before August 15, 1947, continued to enjoy all benefits entitled to them up to that time.
At the stroke of midnight on August 14-15, 1947, British rule officially ended, and power was transferred to the two newly independent Dominions of India and Pakistan. Lord Mountbatten became the first Governor-General of the Dominion of India, swearing in Jawaharlal Nehru as its first Prime Minister. The Constituent Assembly of India, formed in 1946, subsequently became the Parliament of the Indian Dominion.
Interim Government (1946)
The Interim Government of India was formed in 1946 with various key members taking on specific portfolios. Below is a list of the members and the portfolios they held:
Sl. No. | Members | Portfolios Held |
1 | Jawaharlal Nehru | Vice-President of the Council; External Affairs & Commonwealth Relations |
2 | Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel | Home, Information & Broadcasting |
3 | Dr. Rajendra Prasad | Food & Agriculture |
4 | Dr. John Mathai | Industries & Supplies |
5 | Jagjivan Ram | Labour |
6 | Sardar Baldev Singh | Defence |
7 | C.H. Bhabha | Works, Mines & Power |
8 | Liaquat Ali Khan | Finance |
9 | Abdur Rab Nishtar | Posts & Air |
10 | Asaf Ali | Railways & Transport |
11 | C. Rajagopalachari | Education & Arts |
12 | I.I. Chundrigar | Commerce |
13 | Ghaznafar Ali Khan | Health |
14 | Joginder Nath Mandal | Law |
Note: The members of the Interim Government also served on the Viceroy’s Executive Council. The Viceroy remained the head of this council, while Jawaharlal Nehru held the position of Vice-President of the Council.
First Cabinet of Free India (1947)
The first Cabinet of Free India was formed in 1947 following India’s independence. Below is a list of the cabinet members along with their respective portfolios:
Sl. No. | Members | Portfolios Held |
1 | Jawaharlal Nehru | Prime Minister; External Affairs & Commonwealth Relations; Scientific Research |
2 | Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel | Home, Information & Broadcasting; States |
3 | Dr. Rajendra Prasad | Food & Agriculture |
4 | Maulana Abul Kalam Azad | Education |
5 | Dr. John Mathai | Railways & Transport |
6 | R.K. Shanmugham Chetty | Finance |
7 | Dr. B.R. Ambedkar | Law |
8 | Jagjivan Ram | Labour |
9 | Sardar Baldev Singh | Defence |
10 | Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur | Health |
11 | C.H. Bhabha | Commerce |
12 | Rafi Ahmed Kidwai | Communication |
13 | Dr. Shayama Prasad Mukherji | Industries & Supplies |
14 | V.N. Gadgil | Works, Mines & Power |
This cabinet played a crucial role in shaping the policies and direction of India as it embarked on its journey of independence and self-governance.Bottom of Form
Introduction
The Industrial Revolution, which began in the late 18th century, was a transformative period that reshaped production methods through technological advancements and mass manufacturing. This revolution not only revolutionized production but also had a profound impact on global politics, driving European powers to expand their colonial empires. The need for raw materials, new markets, and labor to sustain industrial growth led to the intensification of European colonialism.
Body
1. The Industrial Revolution and the Transformation of Production
2. The Industrial Revolution and the Expansion of European Colonialism
Conclusion
The Industrial Revolution revolutionized global production methods and spurred the expansion of European colonialism, as industrial powers sought to secure raw materials, markets, and labor. This interconnectedness between industrial growth and imperialism not only reshaped the global economy but also laid the foundation for enduring global inequalities that continue to affect the modern world.
Introduction
The Indian nationalist movement, spanning the 19th and 20th centuries, was not merely a political effort against British colonial rule but also a profound cultural renaissance. This cultural revival aimed at reclaiming and redefining India’s identity and heritage, thereby strengthening the foundations of political resistance. The relationship between cultural regeneration and political resistance was mutually reinforcing, with each driving the other forward.
Body
1. Cultural Regeneration as the Foundation of Political Resistance
Rediscovery of India’s Cultural Heritage:
Indian reformers and scholars played a significant role in reviving and promoting the country’s ancient cultural and philosophical traditions. Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Swami Vivekananda sought to reintroduce the teachings of ancient texts, fostering a sense of national pride.
Example: Dayananda Saraswati and the Arya Samaj advocated for a return to Vedic values, framing it as a rejection of the colonial imposition on Indian culture.
The Bengal Renaissance and Nationalism:
The Bengal Renaissance, spearheaded by thinkers like Rabindranath Tagore and Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, integrated cultural revival with nationalist ideas. Their works encouraged a resurgence of Indian consciousness.
Example: Bankim Chandra’s Anandamath, which introduced “Vande Mataram” as a national symbol, became a rallying cry for the nationalist movement.
Education as a Catalyst for Cultural Renewal:
Institutions like Banaras Hindu University (BHU), founded by Madan Mohan Malaviya, combined modern education with Indian traditional values, strengthening the intellectual foundation for political resistance.
Leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak used educational initiatives to cultivate a sense of national identity and to promote resistance against British colonial rule.
Integration of Folk Culture into the Nationalist Struggle:
Folk songs, stories, and symbols, which were vital parts of India’s rural traditions, became instrumental in mobilizing the masses for the nationalist cause.
Example: The bhajan Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram, popularized by Mahatma Gandhi, became a unifying anthem that resonated with people across regions and communities.
2. Political Resistance Fueling Cultural Revival
Religious Symbolism in Political Mobilization:
Political leaders effectively utilized cultural and religious symbolism to stir nationalist sentiment and unite people across India.
Example: Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s promotion of Ganesh Chaturthi as a public festival served not only to celebrate Indian culture but also to foster a sense of unity and pride among the masses.
Countering British Cultural Hegemony:
The nationalist movement sought to challenge the British narrative that portrayed Indians as “uncivilized” and inferior. Cultural narratives highlighting India’s rich heritage became essential in building pride in India’s past.
Example: Swami Vivekananda’s speech at the 1893 Chicago Parliament of Religions emphasized India’s spiritual depth, positioning Indian culture as intellectually and morally superior, thus empowering political resistance.
Conclusion
The Indian nationalist movement was a powerful fusion of cultural regeneration and political resistance. Cultural revival instilled a sense of pride and unity, which invigorated the political struggle against British rule. Conversely, the political resistance provided the necessary urgency and platform for cultural renewal, ensuring its broad reach. This synergy between culture and politics laid the foundation for India’s eventual independence.