The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2011 granted a constitutional recognition and safeguard to co-operative societies. In this regard, it introduced the following three amendments to the constitution:
However, a board shall not be superseded or kept under suspension if there is no Government shareholding, loan, financial assistance, or guarantee by the Government. If a board is superseded, the appointed administrator shall manage the co-operative society’s affairs and arrange for elections within six months and transfer management back to the elected board.
The justifications for including the above provisions in the Constitution through the 97th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2011 are as follows:
2. This diminishes accountability within the management of co-operative societies to their members. Insufficient professionalism in management across many cooperative institutions has led to poor services and reduced productivity. Co-operatives need to operate under well-established democratic principles, with timely and fair elections. Therefore, there was a need to implement fundamental reforms to rejuvenate these institutions, ensuring their contributions to the country’s economic development and serving the interests of members and the broader public, while also guaranteeing their autonomy, democratic functionality, and professional management.
3. The “co-operative societies” are a subject specified in Entry 32 of the state list of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, prompting state legislatures to create relevant legislation. Within the parameters of State Acts, large-scale growth of co-operatives was anticipated as part of initiatives to secure social and economic justice and equitable distribution of development benefits. However, despite a considerable expansion of co-operatives, their qualitative performance has not met expected standards. Given the need for reforms in the Cooperative.
4. Societies Acts of the States, discussions with State Governments have occurred on several occasions, including conferences for state co-operative ministers. There is a compelling demand for amending the Constitution to keep co-operatives insulated from unnecessary external interference and to ensure their autonomous organizational structures and democratic operations.
The Central Government was dedicated to ensuring that co-operative societies across the nation operate in a democratic, professional, autonomous, and economically viable manner. To initiate the necessary reforms, a proposal was made to integrate a new part into the Constitution, addressing key aspects of co-operative societies’ operations such as democratic, autonomous, and professional functioning. It was anticipated that these provisions would guarantee the autonomous and democratic functioning of co-operatives, while also ensuring management accountability to members and other stakeholders, thereby deterring violations of legal provisions.
Article | Subject |
243ZH | Definitions |
243ZI | Incorporation of Co-operative Societies |
243ZJ | Number and Term of Members of Board and its Office Bearers |
243ZK | Election of Members of Board |
243ZL | Supersession and Suspension of Board and Interim Management |
243ZM | Audit of Accounts of Co-operative Societies |
243ZN | Convening of General Body Meetings |
243ZO | Right of a Member to Get Information |
243ZP | Returns |
243ZQ | Offences and Penalties |
243ZR | Application to Multi-state Co-operative Societies |
243ZS | Application to Union Territories |
243ZT | Continuance of Existing Laws |