The effective functioning of India’s federal system relies not only on harmonious relations between the Centre and the states but also on cooperation among the states themselves. To promote inter-state comity, the Constitution establishes several provisions:
Additionally, Parliament established Zonal Councils to further enhance inter-state cooperation and coordination.
Article 262 provides the framework for adjudicating inter-state water disputes through two key provisions:
In line with this provision, two laws have been enacted: the River Boards Act (1956) and the Inter-State Water Disputes Act (1956). The River Boards Act allows for establishing river boards at the request of concerned state governments to advise on the regulation and development of inter-state river systems.
The Inter-State Water Disputes Act empowers the Central government to form an ad hoc tribunal to resolve disputes among states about inter-state river waters. The tribunal’s decisions are final and binding, and neither the Supreme Court nor any other court can intervene in matters referred to the tribunal.
The need for such a specialized adjudicative mechanism stem from the fact that while the Supreme Court could adjudicate disputes involving legal rights or interests, the complexities of public interests in water supply management necessitate dedicated mechanisms beyond private proprietary interests.
As of 2019, the Central government has established nine inter-state water dispute tribunals to address ongoing conflicts among states regarding water distribution.
Here is the list of inter-state water disputes tribunals established by the Central government, along with their setup years and the states involved:
No. | Name of Tribunal | Set-up Year | States Involved |
1 | Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-I | 1969 | Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh |
2 | Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal | 1969 | Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha |
3 | Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal | 1969 | Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra |
4 | Ravi and Beas Water Disputes Tribunal | 1986 | Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan |
5 | Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal | 1990 | Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Puducherry |
6 | Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-II | 2004 | Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh |
7 | Vansadhara Water Disputes Tribunal | 2010 | Odisha and Andhra Pradesh |
8 | Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal | 2010 | Goa, Karnataka, and Maharashtra |
9 | Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal | 2018 | Odisha and Chhattisgarh |
This table summarizes the key facts about the inter-state water disputes tribunals functioning in India.
Article 263 of the Indian Constitution allows for the establishment of an Inter-State Council to facilitate coordination between the states and between the Centre and the states. The President can create such a council if it appears to him that it would serve the public interest. He also has the authority to specify the council’s duties, organization, and procedures.
Though the President has discretion in defining the council’s duties, Article 263 outlines specific responsibilities, including:
(a) Investigating and advising on disputes that may arise between states,
(b) Exploring and discussing topics of mutual interest to the states or between the Centre and the states,
(c) Making recommendations to improve coordination of policy and action related to these subjects.
The council’s advisory function regarding inter-state disputes is complementary to the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under Article 131, which adjudicates legal controversies between governments. Unlike the binding decisions of the Supreme Court, the council’s role is advisory and can address both legal and non-legal disputes.
Under Article 263, the President has established several councils to improve policy and action coordination, including:
The Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State Relations (1983–88) strongly advocated for a permanent Inter-State Council under Article 263. It recommended that this council should be referred to as the Inter-Governmental Council. The panel suggested that the council be tasked with duties specified in clauses (b) and (c) of Article 263.
Following these recommendations, the Janata Dal Government led by V. P. Singh established the Inter-State Council in 1990. Its composition includes:
Additionally, five cabinet-ranked ministers or Ministers of State (independent charge) are permanent invitees to the Council.
The Inter-State Council serves as a recommendatory body, focusing on issues related to inter-state relations, Centre-state relations, and Centre-union territory relations. Its primary duties include:
The Council meets at least three times a year, with meetings held in camera and decisions made by consensus. There is also a Standing Committee of the Council, established in 1996, which facilitates ongoing consultation and processes matters for the Council’s consideration. This committee includes:
The Council is supported by a secretariat known as the Inter-State Council Secretariat, created in 1991 and headed by a secretary appointed by the Government of India. Since 2011, it has also functioned as the secretariat for the Zonal Councils.
The Indian Constitution delineates that the jurisdiction of each state is confined to its own territory, which can lead to situations where the acts and records of one state might not be recognized in another. To address this issue, the Constitution incorporates a “Full Faith and Credit” clause that outlines the following provisions:
Recognition of Acts and Records:
Proof and Effect of Acts:
Execution of Civil Judgments:
Parliament has the authority to designate an appropriate authority to implement these provisions relating to the freedom of trade, commerce, and intercourse, as well as to manage any restrictions. However, as of now, no such authority has been appointed.
Zonal Councils are statutory bodies, established by the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, rather than being created by the Constitution. This Act divided India into five zones: Northern, Central, Eastern, Western, and Southern, with a zonal council designated for each area.
Factors considered in forming these zones included natural divisions of the country, river systems, means of communication, cultural and linguistic affinities, and the needs for economic development, security, and law and order.

Each zonal council comprises the following members:
Advisory roles can be filled by:
The Home Minister serves as the common chairman of all five zonal councils, while each Chief Minister takes turns acting as vice-chairman for a one-year term.
The primary aim of the zonal councils is to promote cooperation and coordination among the states, union territories, and the Centre. They provide a platform for discussions and recommendations on topics such as economic and social planning, linguistic minorities, border disputes, and interstate transport. Their role is deliberative and advisory.
Key objectives include:
In addition to the Zonal Councils, the North-Eastern Council was established by the North-Eastern Council Act of 1971. This council comprises members from Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Sikkim. Its functions closely resemble those of the zonal councils but include some additional responsibilities, such as formulating a unified regional plan on matters of common significance and periodically reviewing security and public order measures implemented by the member states.
| Name | Members | Headquarters |
| Northern Zonal Council | Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, Delhi, Chandigarh, Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh | New Delhi |
| Central Zonal Council | Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh | Allahabad |
| Eastern Zonal Council | Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Odisha | Kolkata |
| Western Zonal Council | Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu | Mumbai |
| Southern Zonal Council | Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Puducherry | Chennai |
